Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Veteran's claims for service connection and a rating increase are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining private medical records and providing proper notice.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2012
The Board has determined that the reduction of the evaluation for diabetes mellitus from 40% to 20% was proper, and no further increase in evaluation is warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · February 2012
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and verifying Vietnam service. The Veteran's claim of diabetes mellitus is presumed due to herbicide exposure in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities, as well as diabetes mellitus, type II, has been denied due to a lack of current disability evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2012
The Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus was not shown to be related to his military service, including presumed herbicide exposure in Vietnam. The claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2012
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II was rated at 10 percent from February 8, 2006 to April 10, 2007 and at 20 percent since April 11, 2007. Erectile dysfunction and peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities are also service-connected as secondary to diabetes mellitus, type II.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2012
The Board has determined that further development of the evidence is required before the claims can be adjudicated, and these cases are being remanded to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC).
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2012
The Veteran's SMC claim for need for regular aid and attendance of another person or housebound status due to service-connected disabilities has been denied as there is no evidence showing he requires such assistance.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2012
The Veteran's service connection claim for a left knee disability was granted, but the condition is not considered secondary to any service-connected disability. The maximum schedular rating of 10% has been assigned for tinnitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2012
The Veteran's appeal is remanded to obtain National Guard service records and determine if the claimed conditions are related to in-service chemical exposure. The AMC/RO will also attempt to confirm the dates of the Veteran's National Guard service, including any periods of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) or inactive duty for training (INACDUTRA).
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2012
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus secondary to hypertension, but has remanded his claim for a higher rating for his right ankle disability. The appeal is mixed as some issues are granted and others are not.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2012
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete service records and a need for further verification of the Veteran's periods of service, including any potential federalized service in February 1992. The claims for diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy are also being remanded.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD was granted with a 100% rating effective January 23, 2007. Service connection was also established for hypertension and diabetes mellitus on the same date.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · January 2012
The Veteran seeks service connection for a bilateral lower extremity disability, including as due to herbicide exposure. The case is remanded for further examination and opinion regarding the etiology of his disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2012
The Veteran's tinnitus is found to be as likely as not related to his military service. The respiratory disorder, diabetes mellitus, and obstructive sleep apnea are all found to be less likely than not related to his military service. The vision disorder is also found to be less likely than not related to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2012
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including posttraumatic stress disorder, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), type II diabetes mellitus, and peripheral neuropathy, have rendered him in need of the regular aid and attendance of another person. As a result, he is entitled to special monthly compensation based on the need for aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to his failure to appear for a scheduled video-conference hearing. The case will be returned to the Board after rescheduling.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2012
The Veteran's rheumatoid arthritis is related to his service-connected posttraumatic stress disorder. The Board has also found that the Veteran's tinnitus is related to active military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2012
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a VA examination to determine if the Veteran currently has a heart disability and whether it is related to his in-service syphilis infection. The issues of PTSD and gallbladder condition are referred to the RO.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's cataracts are caused and/or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus, and thus grants service connection for cataracts as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.