Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of an opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's diabetes mellitus. The Veteran needs to be provided with another VA examination for this purpose.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's cause of death, renal cell carcinoma, was not caused or contributed to by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Board found that the criteria for separate evaluations of 30 percent for each foot were not met during the period from January 12, 1998 until May 21, 2001. The Veteran's appeal was denied as his claim did not meet the required criteria for a higher rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2011
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction, finding that the Veteran's current conditions are related to his in-service diagnoses. The issue of service connection for a urinary tract disability remains pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II and melanoma are being remanded due to the need for additional development regarding his exposure to herbicides in the Philippines.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for a VA examination to assess his current medical condition, including bilateral knee and diabetes mellitus. The case will then be readjudicated based on the new evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus type II is currently rated at 40 percent effective March 17, 2009. The Veteran was previously granted service connection for the condition but not a specific rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional examination to determine the extent of his remaining foot function and whether he has lost use of either lower extremity due to service-connected disabilities. Relevant medical records from the University of Michigan are also requested.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, prostate cancer with residual urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy, and hypertension all due to herbicide exposure during service. The evidence did not support a finding of such exposure.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's PTSD was granted and assigned an initial evaluation of 30 percent, which was increased to 50 percent effective the date of service connection. The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 40 percent disabling with separate ratings for peripheral neuropathy in both upper and lower extremities as well as erectile dysfunction. The low back disability is rated at 20 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2011
The Board finds that the Veteran's fast pulse rate and cardiac arrhythmia are etiologically related to his service-connected hypertension. The preponderance of evidence does not support a rating in excess of 10 percent for hypertension, but erectile dysfunction is found to be present.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not preclude him from securing and maintaining some form of substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 were denied as there was no evidence of exposure to Agent Orange during his service, and the claimed conditions are not related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations and service connection were denied. The claim for service connection of bilateral hearing loss was not considered as it is not related to active military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus secondary to Agent Orange exposure, chronic anemia as secondary to prostate cancer and Agent Orange exposure, skin cancer, lumbar spine disability, and residuals of a right leg burn have been denied due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for further development of his claims, including a VA examination and adjudication of intertwined issues. The TDIU claim will be reconsidered based on all evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to his request for a Travel Board hearing. The case will be returned to the RO after the hearing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran is seeking service connection for a cerebrovascular accident with right hemiparesis due to ischemic stroke, which he claims is related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II. The Board has determined that additional development is needed before the claim can be decided.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II, is currently rated at 20 percent and does not meet the criteria for a higher rating. The Board finds that there is no evidence of regulation of activities due to his DM.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's combined disability evaluation is 70 percent, and he does not meet the criteria for a total rating based on individual unemployability due to his service-connected disabilities.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.