Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed conditions, including venous disorder and diabetes mellitus, are not related to military service or a service-connected disability. The appeal is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities. The appeal was not about service connection at all due to lack of evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2010
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II is currently rated at 20 percent disabling. His diabetic retinopathy is rated as noncompensable but considered part of the diabetic process. The Veteran's service-connected conditions do not meet criteria for a higher rating under any applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2010
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD and diabetes mellitus Type II disabilities meet the schedular requirements for a TDIU, as his combined rating is 80 percent. The evidence shows that he is unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment due to his PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, finding that there is no evidence of in-service exposure to herbicides and that the current condition did not develop during or as a result of service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Veteran's claims of service connection for a left leg disorder, skin disorder, PTSD, and diabetes mellitus were denied. The Board found that new evidence did not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claims, and that there was no direct or presumptive service connection based on exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board has determined that new and material evidence was not received to reopen claims for service connection for various conditions, including CAD, multiple joint disease of the neck, back and feet, diabetes, hypertension, rheumatic heart disease, and a lung disorder. The Veteran's CAD, multiple joint disease of the neck, back and feet, diabetes, hypertension, and rheumatic heart disease are not considered to be related to service or any other service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · August 2010
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus requires daily use of oral medication and insulin, but does not require a restricted diet or regulation of activities. The Board denied an increased rating for the disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for arteriosclerotic heart disease, diabetic nephropathy, gouty arthritis, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. The denial is based on a lack of evidence showing exposure to Agent Orange or other herbicide agents during his naval service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus and hypertension are currently rated at 20 percent and 10 percent, respectively. The Board finds that the current ratings adequately reflect the severity of these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2010
The Board has restored the service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, with diabetic retinopathy and peripheral neuropathy after finding that the severance was improper due to a clear and unmistakable error in granting presumptive service connection based on herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Veteran seeks service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, including as secondary to exposure to herbicides during his tour of duty in Guam. The Board has determined that further verification is needed regarding the Veteran's claimed exposure to herbicides at Anderson Air Force Base in Guam.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board found that the Veteran did not have exposure to herbicides during service and his diabetes mellitus is not related to service, thus denying his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for thoracolumbar spine spondylosis and degenerative disc disease with disc herniation and nerve compression at L4-5, diabetes mellitus, and a left foot condition. The Board found no evidence linking these conditions to his time in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus was not manifested in service or within a year following his discharge, and therefore denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including verifying herbicide exposure and obtaining additional medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type 2 and peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities were denied due to lack of in-service exposure to Agent Orange. The claim for an initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for renal insufficiency and a disability rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus, finding that there was no evidence to support these claims based on the absence of proteinuria or microalbuminuria since the diagnosis of diabetes.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for asthma and diabetes mellitus were denied. The Veteran's bilateral pes planus, recurrent left tibia fractures, PTSD, and pseudofolliculitis barbae were all rated based on their current severity.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Veteran's claim for TDIU is being remanded due to the need for additional evidence and a VA examination.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.