Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Board has granted special monthly pension based on the need for regular aid and attendance, finding that the Veteran requires assistance with bathing, grooming, dressing, meal preparation, housework, shopping, and preparing food.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board denied reimbursement for unauthorized medical expenses incurred from September 2, 2007 to September 7, 2007 as the Veteran was clinically stable and could have been transferred to a VA facility after initial emergency room treatment.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for diabetes mellitus, left knee internal derangement, and right knee internal derangement were denied. The evidence did not show that the disabilities warranted a higher rating under the applicable criteria.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded for further evidentiary development, including VA examinations to assess the impact of his service-connected eye and diabetic disabilities on his ability to work.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability, and the appellant did not provide sufficient evidence to establish exposure to herbicides or other conditions related to Vietnam service. The claims for service connection for the cause of death and eligibility for Dependents' Educational Assistance benefits were denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus was not incurred or aggravated by service, and the Board denied presumptive exposure to herbicides as he did not set foot in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus was not incurred or aggravated during his active service and is not related to any incident of service, including renal glycosuria noted at separation. As a result, the claim for service connection for DM is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · May 2010
The Veteran's service connection claims for diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer are granted due to presumed exposure to herbicides during active duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, and peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities were not incurred in or aggravated by his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, arthritis, and hearing loss due to lack of new and material evidence. The claim for nonservice-connected pension benefits is granted with an effective date of October 7, 2004.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus, which he alleges is due to exposure to herbicides during his military service in Korea and Japan, has been remanded. The VA will seek further verification of the Veteran's claimed exposures and conduct additional development before deciding the case.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus type II is not shown to be due to herbicide exposure during service, and the Board finds no basis for presumptive service connection. The claim is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent, and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted based on current medical evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II is presumed to be due to his exposure to herbicides during active service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board found no evidence of herbicide exposure and concluded that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, was not incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Board has ordered additional development to determine if the Veteran experienced additional disability due to a December 2002 VA cervical spine tumor resection surgery, and whether informed consent was obtained in compliance with regulations.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection and higher initial ratings were denied. The heart disorder claim was denied as there is no evidence of a current disability. The diabetes mellitus claim resulted in a 10% rating, which is the maximum allowed under the criteria. The left and right lower extremity neuropathy claims were granted with each receiving a 20% rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Board has determined that additional action is required due to the possibility of missing records from the Palo Alto VA Medical Center. The case will be remanded for clarification and further review.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities, bladder control problem, and bowel incontinence are denied. The Veteran is granted service connection for kidney disorder as a complication of his service-connected type 2 diabetes mellitus with renal insufficiency. Service connection for erectile dysfunction is granted with an initial noncompensable disability rating.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.