Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various disabilities, including diabetes mellitus type II and its associated secondary conditions, due to a lack of evidence showing such conditions were incurred in or aggravated by his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2009
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine if the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II and prostate cancer residuals are related to his service in Vietnam. The case is REMANDED for this purpose.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2009
The Veteran's PTSD is not rated higher than 50 percent, and his initial noncompensable evaluation for diabetic retinopathy from January 2006 remains unchanged.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2009
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. His bilateral hearing loss was rated noncompensable, and his diabetes mellitus was rated at 20 percent prior to April 16, 2007, and at a noncompensable rating since that date.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2009
The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to obtain an etiological opinion regarding the Veteran's diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, Type II.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2009
The Veteran seeks service connection for diabetes mellitus and a cardiovascular disorder including hypertension, which he attributes to exposure to herbicides during his service in Korea. The case is remanded due to the need for further development of unit records and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection and higher initial ratings are being remanded due to incomplete notice under the VCAA, need for additional medical opinions, and need to obtain private medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2009
The Veteran's eye impairments secondary to diabetes mellitus are manifested by corrected distant visual acuity reported as no worse than 20/20 in the right eye and 20/30 in the left eye. The criteria for a separate compensable rating have not been met.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2009
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, insulin dependent, and hypertension are not rated higher than the current evaluations of 40 percent and 10 percent respectively. The Veteran's tinea pedis is not compensable.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability, and therefore denied the claim for service connection for cause of death. The appellant did not provide sufficient medical evidence to support her belief that the Veteran's PTSD contributed to his arteriosclerotic heart disease or insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2009
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded for further evaluation of his service-connected disabilities and their impact on his employability.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2009
The Board has restored the Veteran's 40 percent evaluation for diabetes mellitus with retinopathy, effective May 1, 2008. The reduction from 40 to 20 percent was found to be void ab initio due to lack of sustained improvement in the disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2009
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA and private treatment records, determining whether the Veteran engaged in combat during service, and attempting to corroborate the Veteran's alleged in-service stressors. The claims will be readjudicated after these actions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2009
The Veteran is seeking service connection for prostate cancer and type II diabetes mellitus based on his claimed exposure to herbicides in service. The case is REMANDED due to the need to obtain additional evidence, including service personnel records and medical records from Social Security Administration.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for hypertension, an acquired psychiatric disorder other than PTSD, diabetes mellitus type II, and a malignant tumor. The decision found that new and material evidence had not been received to reopen these previously denied claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2009
The Veteran's claims for increased disability ratings for diabetes mellitus, traumatic arthritis of the left knee, and bilateral hearing loss are being remanded due to the need for additional VA examinations and evidence collection.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedOctober 2009
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, peripheral neuropathy, and PTSD. The claims are now pending on their merits.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection for depression, a disability manifested by swollen testicles, and angioedema as secondary to Agent Orange exposure were denied. The Board found no evidence of these conditions during service or within the presumptive period following service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2009
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining Social Security Administration (SSA) disability benefits records.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · October 2009
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, type 2, finding that the Veteran was exposed to Agent Orange during his military service and therefore presumed to have been exposed. As a result, he is entitled to presumptive service connection.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.