Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
53,738 vetted Board decisions for Diabetes.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for diabetes mellitus, finding that his exposure to herbicides during active service was not a causative factor leading to the development of his currently diagnosed diabetes mellitus.
The Board found no evidence of diabetes mellitus during service or within the first post-service year, and denied service connection for this condition. The Veteran's allergy and sinus disorder and sleep disturbance were not related to active service.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral neuropathy, do not prevent him from engaging in substantially gainful employment.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed conditions are not related to his military service and have denied all of his claims.
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is presumed to have been incurred in service due to exposure to Agent Orange. Service connection for the other conditions listed, including back disability and residuals of a left eye disability, is denied.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the Veteran's previously denied claim of service connection for diabetes mellitus. The other claims, including those related to tinnitus, allergic rhinitis, a positive tuberculin tine test, and lung disability, were denied.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for residuals of vertebrae fusion. The issue of diabetes mellitus, type II is still pending.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for special monthly compensation based upon the need for regular aid and attendance of another person or by reason of being housebound.
The Board found no medical evidence linking diabetes mellitus, type II to service and denied the Veteran's claim.
The Veteran's hypertension and diabetes mellitus were not service-connected, and the Board denied all claims. The Veteran's retinopathy did not meet criteria for a compensable evaluation.
The Board has determined that the reduction of the Veteran's disability rating from 40 percent to 20 percent was procedurally correct and that a restoration of the 40 percent rating is not warranted.
The Veteran's death was not caused by any service-connected condition, and the service-connected conditions did not contribute to his death. The issues of service connection for heart disease and hypertension as secondary to PTSD and special monthly compensation based on need for aid and attendance were denied.
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to lack of Vietnam service and need further investigation.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to inadequate examination and lack of rationale in the July 2007 VA examination report.
The Board found no evidence of the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents in Vietnam, and thus denied service connection for diabetes mellitus and hypertension as secondary to such exposure. The Board also noted that diabetes mellitus was not shown within one year after separation from active service.
The Veteran's claim for a TDIU is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining his VA Vocational Rehabilitation file and any outstanding VA treatment records. The Veteran will be scheduled for a VA examination to determine if he is unable to secure or maintain substantially gainful employment due to his service-connected disabilities.
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction is currently rated at 20 percent, requiring insulin and a restricted diet.
The Board has granted service connection for PTSD, but denied the claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and diabetes mellitus. The Veteran's claim of service connection for diabetes was not addressed in a de novo decision as required by law.
The Veteran's service connection claims for diabetes and its complications are denied as the evidence does not support a finding that these conditions were incurred or aggravated by active service.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II has been dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.