Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · October 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have diabetes mellitus and therefore, service connection for this condition is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2008
The veteran's decreased visual acuity in the left eye following cataract extraction and vitrectomy was not caused by VA carelessness, negligence, or similar fault.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · October 2008
The veteran's Type II diabetes mellitus and neuropathy of the hands and feet are presumed to have been incurred as a result of exposure to herbicides in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2008
The Board found that the veteran did not meet the legal criteria for recognition as a former prisoner of war (POW) and denied all service connection claims due to lack of evidence supporting the claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2008
The VA has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction and assigned an initial 20 percent rating, effective April 29, 2004. The veteran's condition requires daily insulin injections and restrictions in his diet but does not require regulation of activities.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of any psychiatric disability, diabetic retinopathy (blurred vision), chloracne and porphyria cutanea, or peripheral neuropathy of both upper extremities for purposes of establishing service connection.,Regarding erectile dysfunction, the evidence is insufficient to establish its etiology.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2008
The veteran claims service connection for diabetes mellitus, Type II, due to herbicide exposure during his time in Thailand. The Board has determined that the presumptive provisions do not apply as he did not serve in Vietnam. However, additional development is needed to determine if there was any other basis for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2008
The Board has determined that diabetes mellitus is not proximately due to or the result of taking prednisone for service-connected asthma, and defective hearing was not incurred in or aggravated by military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2008
The veteran's diabetes mellitus has been managed with oral hypoglycemic medication and restricted diet. He does not require a restriction of activities or experience episodes of ketoacidosis or hypoglycemic reactions.,Starting in January 2006, the veteran experiences constant pain and tiredness, numbness, and cramping after extended walking. There is decreased pinprick and vibration sense at the ankles with complete loss of sensitivity.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2008
The veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus and associated peripheral neuropathy have been granted increased ratings, but not to the maximum levels. The veteran continues to experience symptoms that affect his daily activities.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2008
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus based on aggravation by service during active duty. The veteran's pre-existing Type II diabetes mellitus was found to have worsened beyond its natural progression due to factors such as stress, lack of sleep, and constant work-related stress.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2008
The veteran's claims for increased disability ratings for his service-connected knee disabilities and other conditions were denied.,Service connection was not established for fibromyalgia, residuals of a back injury, diabetes mellitus, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), sleep apnea, chronic pain, atypical chest pain, psoriasis, arthritis of multiple joints, or cervical spine disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2008
The Board has granted service connection for various conditions, including hypertension and diabetes mellitus with venostasis ulcers. The veteran's initial rating for diabetes mellitus is set at 20 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2008
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for special monthly pension for aid and attendance and housebound status due to her inability to meet the criteria for such benefits, as she is not in need of regular aid and assistance or substantially confined to her home.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran's diabetes mellitus, Type II and hypertension are not service-connected. The chronic kidney condition and vision problems were also found to be unrelated to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased rating for his diabetic retinopathy and service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper extremities, finding that there was no evidence to support these claims. The hypertension claim is remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, finding no evidence of in-service exposure to herbicides and insufficient medical evidence linking the condition to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and therefore, service connection for this condition cannot be granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2008
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus and an unknown allergy manifested by swelling of the tongue, finding no medical evidence linking these conditions to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2008
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including scheduling a VA examination by an endocrinologist to determine if the veteran's diabetes had its onset during or within one year of his discharge from service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.