Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
53,738 vetted Board decisions for Diabetes.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, finding no evidence to support these claims.
The Board has determined that the veteran's diabetes mellitus requires a higher evaluation from January 28, 2002. However, the issue of service connection for a gastrointestinal disorder remains in appellate status.
The veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 40 percent, effective August 2003. The claim for service connection for psoriasis has been granted and reopened.
The Board has remanded the case for further action, including scheduling a VA diabetes mellitus examination and readjudicating the issue of entitlement to an initial evaluation in excess of 20 percent for service-connected diabetes mellitus.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy of both upper and lower extremities, as well as his requests for increased ratings for residuals of bilateral quadriceps muscle tears. The appeals are remanded to the RO.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, finding no evidence of Vietnam service and a remote onset of the condition after discharge from active duty.
The veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability, and there is no evidence of qualifying chronic disabilities for presumptive service connection. The claim for the cause of death is denied.
The Board has determined that the veteran's hypertension is not service-connected, but they have ordered a remand to provide another VA examination and correct VCAA notice.
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to address the merits of the veteran's claims, including a VA medical examination for his service connection and TDIU claims.
The Board has determined that the evidence supports granting service connection for hypertension as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus.
The veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus is being remanded due to the need to verify his periods of active duty and obtain medical opinions regarding whether his condition began or worsened during those periods.
The veteran's diabetes mellitus type II was not incurred or aggravated by service, and there is no evidence of exposure to Agent Orange. The claim for presumptive service connection based on Vietnam service is denied.
The veteran's atherosclerotic heart disease warrants a 60 percent disability rating, effective July 29, 1994. The veteran's diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent, also effective from July 29, 1994.
The Board has determined that the veteran's hypertension, diabetes mellitus, enlarged prostate disorder, and urinary tract disorder are not related to his active service. The claims for these conditions have been denied.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for additional monthly DIC pursuant to 38 U.S.C.A. § 1311(a)(2) because the veteran was not service connected for any disability at the time of his death and did not file a claim for service connection during his lifetime.
The veteran's initial evaluation for type II diabetes mellitus is denied as his condition does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation.
The VA determined that the veteran's diabetes mellitus requires a restricted diet and insulin injections twice daily, warranting a 20% disability rating. The evidence did not show any need for regulation of activities.
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, based on presumed exposure to Agent Orange during the veteran's Vietnam-era service.
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for primary open angle glaucoma, secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The evidence does not support a link between the veteran's glaucoma and his military service or his service-connected diabetes.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for an eye disorder secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II. The VA examiner found that the veteran does not have diabetic retinopathy and concluded that any current eye disorders are not related to his active duty service or his service-connected conditions.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.