Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2006
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining more specific information about the veteran's activities in Vietnam and scheduling a comprehensive psychiatric examination to determine if PTSD is service-connected. The VA also needs to schedule an evaluation of the veteran's diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board finds that the veteran does not require aid and attendance of another person due to his disabilities, including diabetic retinopathy which resulted in blindness in one eye. Therefore, he is denied special monthly pension based on need for aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board found that an earlier effective date for the award of non-service-connected disability pension is not warranted, as there was no prior informal or formal claim received by VA prior to November 13, 2001.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board found that the veteran did not have type II diabetes mellitus or hypertension due to service, and denied these claims. The claim for erectile dysfunction was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection of his stroke as secondary to diabetes and an earlier effective date for erectile dysfunction, diabetic nephropathy, diabetic neuropathy of the lower extremities, and peripheral neuropathy. The Board found that the August 1973 rating decision reducing the skin disorder was not CUE, and denied both the secondary service connection claim and the earlier effective date claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · June 2006
The veteran's diabetes mellitus is presumed to have been incurred during active service due to exposure to Agent Orange.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board found that the veteran's death was not caused by or substantially contributed to by any service-connected disability, including his heart disorder.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The Board has granted a higher rating of 30 percent for the veteran's residuals of acne, effective from the date of the initial decision. The claim for an increased rating for diabetes mellitus remains pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's diabetes mellitus is related to his military service, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims of entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for diabetes mellitus, a heart disorder, and liver and pancreas disorders due to lack of evidence showing causation.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The veteran's claims for higher initial ratings for Type II Diabetes Mellitus, peripheral neuropathy of the arms and legs, and bilateral proliferative diabetic retinopathy were denied. The veteran was also denied service connection for a stroke secondary to his diabetes.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, headaches, and a low back disorder, all claimed as secondary to exposure to Agent Orange. The appeals were based on presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2006
The veteran is seeking service connection for coronary artery disease, which he claims is secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The case has been remanded due to the need for additional development and examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · June 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for Type 2 diabetes mellitus, finding that there was no in-country service or visitation in Vietnam and thus no presumptive exposure to Agent Orange. The Board also found that the current diagnosis of diabetes did not manifest within one year of separation from service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for a certificate of eligibility for financial assistance in the purchase of an automobile and adaptive equipment, or for adaptive equipment only. The veteran also does not qualify for special monthly compensation at a rate in excess of that authorized by 38 U.S.C.A. § 1114(l).
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has determined that the cause of the veteran's death is not service-connected and that DIC benefits are also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has determined that the preponderance of the evidence is against the veteran's claims for higher ratings for diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy, finding that the conditions are no more than mild.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's prostate cancer and type II diabetes mellitus are not related to his military service, including exposure to Agent Orange. The claims for service connection have been denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at a 40 percent rating, which is higher than the current 20 percent rating. The evidence shows that his diabetes now requires him to regulate his activities due to hypoglycemic reactions.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board found that the veteran's diabetes mellitus, with diabetic neuropathy of the lower extremities and erectile dysfunction, does not warrant a disability evaluation in excess of 20 percent.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.