Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has determined that the veteran's diabetes mellitus with diabetic coronary artery disease and diabetic heart disease occlusion did not begin or increase in severity during service, nor can it be presumed to have begun due to exposure to Agent Orange. The claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the appellant's exposure to herbicides and his service in Vietnam, which is necessary for determining whether he can be presumed exposed to Agent Orange. The claim will be reconsidered after additional development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and providing a VA examination to determine if the veteran's diabetes mellitus, allergies, or cataracts are related to his military service exposure to neurotoxins.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board found no evidence of service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus, and the veteran's current diagnosis was not shown to be related to his military service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The VA denied the veteran's claims for an increased initial evaluation of diabetes mellitus and service connection for hypertension. The VA found that there was no evidence to support a higher rating for diabetes mellitus or a link between hypertension and service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · December 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's service in Vietnam qualifies him for presumed exposure to Agent Orange, and diabetes mellitus, type II is among the diseases recognized as etiologically associated with such exposure. Therefore, the claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, due to Agent Orange exposure is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for his low back strain with degenerative changes is being remanded due to the need for further development and clarification of whether any current neurological symptoms can be solely attributable to the low back disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The veteran is seeking service connection for hypertension as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, and a higher evaluation for his diabetes mellitus. The case needs further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The Board has determined that the claims are not ready for appellate disposition due to missing service medical records and lack of information regarding the veteran's POW status. The VA is instructed to make reasonable efforts to obtain relevant records, including from private providers.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The veteran's diabetes mellitus was not incurred or aggravated by service, and there is no presumption of service connection based on herbicide exposure. The Board denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2005
The veteran has withdrawn his appeal, so there are no remaining issues for the Board to consider.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The Board has ordered additional development due to incomplete records and unclear medical history. The case will be remanded for further investigation into the veteran's service, employment history, and medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including bilateral knee disorder, left shoulder disorder, gastrointestinal disorder, heart disorder, seizure disorder (epilepsy), bronchitis, and diabetes mellitus. The decision found that new evidence did not establish a current disability or link these conditions to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board found that the veteran's diabetes mellitus, Type 2 and COPD were not incurred or aggravated by active service. The evidence did not establish a link between these conditions and his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board has determined that a rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus is not warranted based on the evidence provided.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2005
The veteran's service-connected diabetic polyneuropathy of the left and right feet is currently rated at 20 percent each, while his diabetes mellitus type 2 is rated at 20 percent. The Board finds that these ratings are appropriate based on the current evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 20 percent, the minimum rating available under VA regulations. The Board found that his condition does not warrant a higher rating as it does not require regulation of activities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and arranging for a VA examination to determine his employability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The veteran died of hypostatic pneumonia, which was due to a cerebrovascular accident caused by diabetes mellitus. The Board found no service connection for any disability and could not establish that the death was related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board denied the veteran's petitions to reopen his service connection claims for wrist condition and PTSD, as well as his claim for skin rash due to herbicide exposure. The claim for diabetes mellitus with peripheral neuropathy was also denied. Additionally, the rating for low back disability was not increased.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.