Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
53,738 vetted Board decisions for Diabetes.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and TDIU were denied. The case was remanded for further development regarding peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's type 2 diabetes mellitus caused or aggravated his congestive heart failure (CHF).
The Veteran's 40 percent rating for macular degeneration is restored, and he is eligible for specially adapted housing.
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, finding no evidence of exposure to Agent Orange and no in-service or post-service diagnosis.
The Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus with hypertension is manifested by no more than required insulin and a restricted diet without a history of systolic pressure predominantly 160 or more or diastolic pressure predominantly 100 or more. The Board finds the claim for higher or separate ratings is denied.
The Veteran's tinnitus is currently rated at 10 percent, which is the maximum rating allowed under VA guidelines.,Diabetes mellitus is rated at 20 percent and does not meet criteria for a higher rating as it does not require insulin or restricted diet regulation.,Erectile dysfunction is not deformed to warrant a compensable rating.,TDIU was denied prior to February 28, 2013 due to the Veteran's previous employment. TDIU was granted beginning February 28, 2013.,The Veteran was found to be marginally employed and thus eligible for TDIU beginning February 28, 2013.
The appeal for diabetes mellitus is dismissed as service connection was granted. The claim for an acquired psychiatric disability other than PTSD remains on appeal.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for diabetes, gout, bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, and eye disorder as secondary to service-connected disabilities due to a lack of definitive opinions regarding causation or aggravation.
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to insufficient evidence. The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus is denied as there is no in-service onset or continuity of symptoms within a presumptive period.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current diabetes mellitus is related to service, and therefore grants service connection for this condition.
The Board denied service connection for DM, hypertension, and a brain disorder that manifests as a stroke due to in-service exposure to herbicides. The Veteran's DM is not service-connected, and there is no evidence of in-service exposure or continuity of symptomatology.,Service connection was also denied for hypertension and a brain disorder secondary to DM because the Veteran's DM is not service-connected.
The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for a back condition, diabetes mellitus, left eye condition, and congestive heart failure and cardiomyopathy due to incomplete development.
The Veteran was granted a TDIU from May 12, 2015 to April [REDACTED], 2018 due to his service-connected coronary artery disease and diabetes.
The Veteran's appeal for increased ratings and service connection has been remanded due to the need for additional examinations and opinions. The issues of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, left arm numbness, and bilateral hearing loss are pending.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for tinnitus was reopened and granted. Service connection is also granted for tinnitus. However, the claims for other conditions including CTS, psychiatric disorders, DMII, arthritis, kidney disorder, peripheral neuropathy, eye disorder, foot disorder, skin rash, and ED were denied.
The Veteran's hepatitis claim is denied as there is no current diagnosis of hepatitis.,The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss claim is denied as the evidence does not support a finding that his hearing loss began during service or is related to an in-service injury, event, or disease.,The Veteran's personality disorder and low sex drive claims are withdrawn by the appellant.,The Veteran's balance issue claim is remanded for further examination to determine its etiology.,The Veteran's diabetes mellitus claim is remanded as VA records need to be obtained and a medical opinion provided regarding its onset and relationship to service.,The Veteran's hypertension claim is remanded due to the inextricably intertwined nature with his diabetes mellitus claim.,The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disability (depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation) claim is withdrawn by the appellant.,The Veteran's narcolepsy claim is remanded for further examination to determine its etiology.,The Veteran's insomnia claim is remanded due to the inextricably intertwined nature with his back and left knee disability claims.,The Veteran's chronic fatigue claim is remanded due to the inextricably intertwined nature with his acquired psychiatric disability (depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation) claim.,The Veteran's back disability claim is remanded for further examination to determine its etiology.,The Veteran's left knee disability claim is remanded for further examination to determine its etiology.
The Board has granted service connection for coronary artery disease, type II diabetes, diabetic neuropathy of the right foot, and diabetic neuropathy of the left foot. The conditions are presumed to be due to exposure to herbicide agents during service.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for clarification on the causal link between the Veteran's service and his diabetes mellitus, specifically regarding when he began developing the condition.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation, as his combined rating is at least 70%.
The Veteran's bilateral lower extremity diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy of the sciatic nerve is currently evaluated as 10 percent disabling.,The Veteran's service-connected disabilities preclude him from securing and following any substantially gainful employment.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.