Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2021
The Board has remanded the cases due to a duty to assist error in prior rating decisions, and requests that new evidence be provided for service connection claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2021
The Board has remanded the claim of service connection for vision problems, claimed as secondary to pre-diabetic (diabetes mellitus, type 2), due to a lack of an adequate VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · October 2021
The Veteran's service connection claim for diabetes mellitus, type 2, resulting from exposure to Agent Orange in service is granted. The Board finds that the Veteran had presumptive herbicide agent exposure as a result of his service in the Republic of Vietnam and has been diagnosed with, and treated for, diabetes mellitus, type 2.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2021
The Veteran's service-connected Parkinson's disease and diabetic neuropathy necessitate the use of knee braces, which cause damage to his clothing. The Board has granted a clothing allowance for these knee braces in calendar year 2020.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2021
The Veteran's ratings for diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities were reduced to zero percent, effective April 7, 2020. The rating for bilateral flat feet was restored to a 30 percent rating effective April 7, 2020.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2021
The Board denied service connection for lung cancer, liver bile duct cancer, heart disease, and diabetes mellitus type II (DM) as these conditions are not related to the Veteran's military service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2021
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including diabetes and multiple types of peripheral neuropathy, have rendered him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment as of December 20, 2016. The Board finds that the combined effect of his physical and psychiatric conditions has made it impossible for him to engage in any form of substantial gainful employment.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedOctober 2021
The Veteran's claim for service connection for polyarthritis has been reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence. The case is remanded for further examination and opinion regarding the etiology of his polyarthritis.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II remains in dispute as it was previously denied based on herbicide exposure. The case is remanded for a VA examination to consider the Veteran's new theory of cadmium exposure.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2021
The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for dermatographism has been dismissed. The Board has also remanded the issue of service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2021
The Board has remanded the case due to issues related to TDIU prior to April 28, 2009. The AOJ is required to refer the case for extraschedular consideration of TDIU.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2021
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction, finding that there was no evidence of actual exposure to Agent Orange or other herbicide agents during his time at the Naval Construction Battalion Center in Gulfport, Mississippi. The Board also found that presumptive service connection based on Agent Orange exposure is not warranted.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2021
The Veteran's claim for a disability rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus is denied as the evidence does not show that his condition requires regulation of activities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2021
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for sleep apnea and diabetes mellitus, type II due to potential exposure to hazardous chemicals while stationed at Dugway Proving Ground in service. The Veteran will be afforded VA examinations to evaluate the nature and likely etiology of his claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2021
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and verifying the Veteran's exposure to Agent Orange. The cause of death is being considered based on presumed Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2021
The Board has remanded the claims for type II diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease due to additional development needed, including verifying service in the Korean DMZ and exposure to herbicide agents. The Veteran's current conditions may be related to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2021
The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for diabetes mellitus type II with onychomycosis of the toenails was denied. The Board found that his condition required only restricted diet and one or more daily injection of insulin, not regulation of activities. His TDIU claim from April 27, 2005, was granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2021
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation for aid and attendance due to service-connected disabilities, finding that his service-connected conditions alone did not render him in need of regular aid and assistance.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2021
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for service connection for various disabilities, including bilateral plantar fasciitis, allergic rhinitis, diabetes mellitus type II, hypertension, left and right knee disabilities, and erectile dysfunction. Additional development is needed as VA examinations are required.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2021
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for service-connected tension headaches (claimed as headaches) was denied. The Board found that the evidence did not show characteristic prostrating attacks of migraine/non-migraine headache pain during the appeal period.,The issue of entitlement to a compensable rating for service-connected bilateral hearing loss is remanded due to inadequate audiological examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2021
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions and a need for further development regarding service connection for cerebrovascular accident (CVA). The Veteran's representative argued that hypertension should also be considered, but it is not currently part of the claim.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.