Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
53,738 vetted Board decisions for Diabetes.
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, due to herbicide exposure in Thailand. Service connection was denied for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus as these conditions are not related to military service.
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected conditions contributed to his death. The appellant seeks service connection for the cause of her husband's death, which was caused by multiple factors including obesity and hypertension.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, to include as secondary to herbicide exposure, is denied. The Board found no evidence of herbicide exposure and the Veteran was not shown to have a current disability related to his time in service.
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection and separate ratings for his bilateral upper and lower extremity diabetic-related peripheral neuropathy was denied.,An earlier effective date of November 16, 2009, though no earlier, is granted for the award of service connection for left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy associated with diabetes mellitus.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to exposure to herbicide agents, including for coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, erectile dysfunction secondary to those conditions, and tinnitus. The claims are being remanded for further development, including verification of the Veteran's alleged service in Vietnam and proximity to the base perimeter.
The Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus requires oral medication, daily insulin, and a restricted diet. Regulation of activities has not been demonstrated, so the claim for a higher rating is denied.
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD and diabetic sensory-motor peripheral neuropathy have prevented him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation since June 30, 2013. The Board has granted the TDIU claim for this period.
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities, alone, were not of sufficient severity to render him unable to secure and maintain substantially gainful employment prior to February 21, 2014.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) prior to October 25, 2012, finding that his service-connected disabilities alone were not of sufficient severity to render him unable to secure and maintain substantially gainful employment.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for type II diabetes mellitus, bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, and eye disorder are denied as there is no evidence of herbicide exposure during service or a link to the conditions.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for prostate cancer, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension were denied. The Board found that the residuals of prostate cancer did not warrant a higher rating than 40 percent, DM was rated at 20 percent as it required no insulin or regulation of activities, and HTN was not shown to be related to service.
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is denied as there is no evidence of in-service noise exposure or a connection to service.,A TDIU from November 23, 2015 is granted due to the Veteran's service-connected diabetic peripheral neuropathy preventing him from securing and following substantially gainful employment.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for a heart disorder and diabetes mellitus due to herbicide exposure, as they did not explicitly assess the credibility of the Veteran's statements about in-service herbicide exposure. The AOJ is required to verify the claimed exposure.
The Board dismissed the veteran's claims for service connection due to his death during the appeal process.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for stroke residuals, finding that there is no evidence of a direct link to his military service or secondary to his service-connected conditions. The Board also found that there was insufficient evidence linking the Veteran's stroke to herbicide exposure.
The Board has remanded the cases of hypertension and diabetes mellitus for further development, including obtaining VA examinations to determine their etiology.
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus type 2 due to insufficient evidence in the record.
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for an eye disability and TDIU prior to December 30, 2008 due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's eye disabilities. The AOJ is instructed to obtain SSA records and provide an addendum opinion from a clinician.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus and right ankle disability have been granted. The heart disability claim has been denied as the evidence does not show more than one episode of congestive heart failure in the past year, a workload of greater than 3 METs but not greater than 5 METs resulting in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness or syncope, or left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30 to 50 percent. The diabetes claim has been denied as the evidence does not show that his diabetes required insulin and a restricted diet or hypoglycemic agents and restricted diet.
The Veteran's right upper extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy is rated at 40 percent, effective June 21, 2016.,The Veteran's left upper extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy is rated at 30 percent, effective June 21, 2016.,The Veteran's right lower extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy is rated at 20 percent, effective June 21, 2016.,The Veteran's left lower extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy is rated at 20 percent, effective June 21, 2016.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.