Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for a heart disability, prostate cancer, diabetes mellitus type II, and erectile dysfunction due to the failure to verify the Veteran's claimed herbicide agent exposure during his period of active duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, finding that the evidence did not support a link between the Veteran's exposure to herbicides and contaminated water during service and his current diagnosis of diabetes.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable, and the Board denies his claim for TDIU.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2020
The Veteran's tinnitus, hypertension, and venous insufficiency are all granted as service-connected.,Service connection for bilateral hearing loss (BHL), gout, and diabetic peripheral neuropathy is remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of service connection for diabetes mellitus, type 2 and sleep apnea due to duty-to-assist errors. The Veteran needs additional VA medical opinions regarding whether his service-connected lumbar spine disability caused or aggravated these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2020
The Veteran's service-connected conditions, including Parkinson’s disease and related disorders, render him in need of regular aid and attendance. The Board granted his claim for special monthly compensation based on the need for aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Veteran's claim for service connection for high cholesterol, secondary to diabetes mellitus is denied.,The Veteran's initial rating for diabetes mellitus remains at 20% and is not increased.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, secondary to diabetes mellitus is remanded due to a duty to assist error.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for heart disability (ischemic heart disease), due to Agent Orange exposure is remanded due to a duty to assist error.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to a failure to obtain VA treatment records related to nerve conduction studies for diabetic neuropathy. The Veteran is seeking service connection for diabetic neuropathy in both lower extremities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Veteran's claim for increased rating of type II diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction was denied, and his claim for a compensable rating for peripheral vascular disease is remanded due to inadequate examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The diabetes mellitus claim was denied as the symptoms did not meet the criteria for a higher rating, and the prostate cancer claim was denied due to lack of evidence of renal dysfunction or urinary tract infection. Service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities could not be established.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Board denied service connection for the Veteran's claimed conditions, including diabetes mellitus, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), coronary artery disease, kidney disease, anemia, bilateral eye disorder, and hypertension, all of which are presumed to be due to exposure to Agent Orange in Thailand.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2020
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus has been dismissed. The issues of an initial compensable rating for right nephrolithiasis and TDIU have been remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim of service connection for diabetes mellitus due to lack of substantial compliance with its October 2018 Remand directives. The appeal is also remanded to obtain a new opinion on the relationship between the Veteran's current diabetes and his active military service, including exposure to herbicide agents.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2020
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims for service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to diabetes mellitus and entitlement to SMC for loss of use of a creative organ. The claim for a higher rating for diabetes mellitus was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for TDIU prior to May 16, 2016 due to a lack of evidence showing that his service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Board denied the claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, finding that there was no evidence of its onset during service or causation due to service.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2020
The Veteran's appeals for service connection and rating increases have been dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal as his substantive appeal was not filed within the required time frame, despite the presumption of regularity and potential equitable tolling.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to conflicting information regarding the Veteran's service-connected disabilities and their impact on his ability to use his feet. The VA is instructed to schedule an examination to clarify these issues.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2020
The Veteran's generalized anxiety disorder is rated at 70 percent from December 18, 2013 to June 21, 2016, due to its significant impact on his occupational and social functioning.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.