Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2020
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for eye disability, DM II, hypertension, and auditory dysfunction due to insufficient evidence of a nexus between these conditions and service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2020
The Veteran's prostate cancer residuals are currently rated at 40 percent and no higher.,Diabetes mellitus is rated at 40 percent and no higher.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2020
The Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, dermatitis on the right and left legs, and scar formation of the bilateral lower extremities. The Veteran's diabetes mellitus type II was granted service connection.,Service connection was also granted for prostate cancer, diabetic retinopathy secondary to diabetes mellitus type II, and erectile dysfunction secondary to diabetes mellitus type II.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2020
The Board has remanded these claims for further action, including determining if the surviving spouse can substitute as the claimant.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2020
The claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 50 percent for service-connected PTSD is denied. The claim for TDIU due to service-connected disabilities is also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2020
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, neuropathy of the right and left upper extremities, but denied tinnitus. The issues regarding neuropathy of the lower extremities and bilateral hearing loss are remanded.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2020
The Board has granted the reopening of a previously denied claim and service connection for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on the grounds that it is presumed to have been incurred due to herbicide exposure during active duty.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2020
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including seeking evidence about the Veteran's part-time work as an auctioneer and determining whether it qualifies as marginal employment. The VA examinations are also needed to assess the impact of his service-connected disabilities on his employability.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2020
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II is denied as there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the Veteran was exposed to herbicides during active service and his current condition is not related to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2020
The Board found compelling circumstances warranted the Veteran's prolonged unauthorized absence, thus finding that his character of discharge from service for the period from October 1965 to March 1973 does not constitute a statutory or regulatory bar to VA compensation benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2020
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for coronary artery disease was granted from February 20, 2019 to September 15, 2019. The TDIU claim prior to September 16, 2019 was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2020
The Board has remanded the case for further development regarding the propriety of severing service connection for diabetes mellitus, type 1 and for determining an appropriate effective date.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2020
The Veteran's diabetes-related nerve damage in his lower extremities and left upper extremity has been rated at 20 percent, while his right upper extremity is rated at 30 percent.,The Veteran's service-connected diabetic neuropathy of the right lower extremity, left lower extremity, and left upper extremity have all received increased disability ratings to reflect their severity.,A total disability rating based on individual unemployability prior to June 19, 2020 has been granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2020
The Board has granted an earlier effective date of January 24, 1992 for the award of service connection for diabetes mellitus type 2.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2020
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for Diabetes Mellitus (Type II) and left eye blindness due to potential direct service connection based on exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune. The Veteran's medical conditions are not entitled to presumptive service connection, but may be related to his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2020
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete medical records and the need for a VA examination to assess the current severity of the Veteran's diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension due to inadequate medical opinions regarding its etiology. The case will be returned for further development and an additional VA medical opinion.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2020
The Veteran is eligible for financial assistance in purchasing an automobile or adaptive equipment due to the effective loss of use of one or both feet caused by his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2020
The Veteran's petition to reopen claims for left knee, bilateral hearing loss, and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities have been granted. The claim for diabetes mellitus has been denied.,The Veteran's hypertension and erectile dysfunction claims are remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2020
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for service connection for ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus type II should be remanded due to a duty to assist error. The Veteran needs further development to determine if he served within 12 nautical miles of the Republic of Vietnam, which could affect his eligibility for presumptive service connection under Agent Orange exposure.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.