Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2020
The Board has reopened the Veteran's previously denied claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus and remanded it for further development. The SMC based on aid and attendance claim is also remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2020
The Board has remanded the cases for further investigation regarding the Veteran's claimed exposure to herbicide agents during service, specifically at Clark Air Base in the Philippines. The Veteran is seeking service connection for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Diabetes Mellitus, Type II.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2020
The Board has decided that the VA examination and opinion regarding the Veteran's claimed PVD are not adequate, and thus remanded this case for further development including a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2020
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II is granted as service-connected due to presumed exposure to herbicide agents in the Korean DMZ.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2020
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome and an undiagnosed illness, finding that his symptoms were attributable to other conditions such as hypothyroidism, sleep apnea, diabetes, and obesity.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2020
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection and increased ratings for ischemic heart disease and diabetes, finding that she did not qualify as a child for substitution or accrued benefits purposes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2020
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II and prostate cancer are granted service connection based on herbicide exposure during service. Skin cancer and vitiligo are also granted service connection due to herbicide exposure. The retina disability and bladder cysts remain in dispute and require further examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2020
The Board has granted an initial rating of 40 percent for diabetes mellitus, type II, effective October 18, 2012. The evidence is in equipoise as to whether the Veteran's diabetes requires regulation of activities in addition to established insulin requirements and a restricted diet.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedAugust 2020
A disability evaluation of 70 percent for PTSD is granted from October 5, 2012 to December 22, 2019. A TDIU due solely to service-connected PTSD is also granted.,From December 23, 2019 forward, a higher rating for PTSD is denied and the case is remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2020
The Veteran's appeal includes multiple issues related to his service-connected conditions, including heart disorder, various types of peripheral neuropathy, and PTSD. The Board has determined that additional development is needed due to incomplete VA treatment records.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2020
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II and increased ratings for his right arm disabilities due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to his military service. The Board found that the Veteran did not serve in Vietnam or Korea, and there was no credible evidence of herbicide exposure at Fort Campbell.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2020
The Board has decided that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus may be related to his service, specifically his exposure to herbicides during active duty. However, due to lack of evidence in the record regarding specific herbicide exposure and verification of mustard gas, blister gas, and nerve gas exposure at Camp Pendleton, further development is required.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2020
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and lymphoma, finding that there is no evidence of a nexus between these conditions and her active duty service or any in-service exposure to chemicals like PCBs.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2020
The Board has remanded the claim for further development and an addendum opinion regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities caused him to become obese, which in turn led to diabetes.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2020
The Veteran withdrew his claims for increased ratings in multiple conditions. As a result, the appeals are dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2020
The Board has remanded the cases for further development, including new VA examinations and consideration of a TDIU claim. The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have increased in severity.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2020
The Board has denied service connection for chloracne, ischemic heart disease, and diabetes mellitus type II due to herbicide agent exposure. The issues of service connection for these conditions are remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2020
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent, and his peripheral neuropathy of the left upper extremity is currently rated at 20 percent. Both conditions are denied for increased ratings.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2020
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete documentation and a need for an addendum medical opinion. The Veteran's death is related to negligence in both allowing him to use the bathroom unattended and performing the thoracotomy procedure.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2020
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II with hyperglycemia as there was no evidence to support a direct or presumptive link between his active service and the condition.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.