Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2020
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied for various conditions, including high cholesterol, gout, erectile dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, a sleep disability, a heart disability, urinary incontinence, an acquired psychiatric disability (to include depression and anxiety), headaches, a prostate disability, a thyroid disability, and hypertension. The Board found that there was no evidence of current disabilities or a causal relationship to service for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and consideration, including obtaining additional medical records and addressing rating reductions.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2020
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease due to his withdrawal of these issues. The skin disability claim is denied as there is no evidence of a current chronic skin condition, while the tinnitus and bilateral hearing loss disabilities are remanded for additional development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Veteran's claim for service connection for prostate cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus is being remanded due to the need to verify his exposure to herbicides during his service in Thailand.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Board has remanded the claims due to insufficient evidence and need for additional development, including obtaining more detailed medical records and clarifying service dates.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and progressive supranuclear palsy were denied in a June 2011 rating decision. The appellant is the surviving spouse of the Veteran, who died in February 2012. The Board granted recognition as the substitute claimant for these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2020
The Veteran was granted a TDIU from April 1, 2011 to November 18, 2015 due to service-connected disabilities. The rating period prior to September 25, 2010 did not meet the criteria for TDIU.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2020
The Veteran's neck disability is not service-connected as it did not manifest during or within one year after service, and there is no evidence of a nexus to service.,The Veteran's type 2 diabetes mellitus was not caused by his service-connected lumbar disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2020
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a back disability was granted. The claims for increased ratings of diabetes mellitus type 2 and peripheral neuropathy were denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2020
The Board has granted secondary service connection for lower left and right extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy, finding that the Veteran's current conditions are related to his service-connected type II diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to conflicting medical opinions and a need for further development, including an additional VA medical opinion regarding the cause of death.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2020
The Veteran's depressive disorder is rated at 70 percent, effective prior to September 11, 2019. His diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2020
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected bipolar disorder, and dismissed the TDIU claim due to the full grant of a 100% rating for bipolar disorder. The bilateral hearing loss issue is remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2020
The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for left knee DJD and TDIU was denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating for left knee DJD, as it did not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent under DCs 5260-5262. For TDIU, the Veteran's combined disability rating is 80%, and he has met the schedular requirements since October 2011. However, there was no evidence showing that his service-connected disabilities have precluded him from gainful employment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Veteran's prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus, type II are granted service connection on a presumptive basis due to herbicide exposure. The issue of service connection for erectile dysfunction is remanded as the evidence is unclear regarding whether the Veteran has this condition or its etiology.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2020
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II and its associated peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities to include as secondary to Agent Orange exposure. The Veteran's claims are remanded for further development regarding his lumbar spine disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2020
The Veteran's bilateral hip disorder and tinnitus are granted, but his peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity and bilateral upper extremities is remanded for further evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to concerns regarding the sufficiency of the medical opinion provided in the July 2018 decision, particularly with respect to hypertension and its relationship to service-connected diabetes and diabetic nephropathy.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2020
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not prevent him from obtaining or maintaining substantially gainful employment prior to June 12, 2012.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2020
The Board has dismissed all claims for service connection due to the Veteran's death.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.