Erectile dysfunction decisions — 2006
129 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2006
The veteran's residuals of prostate cancer are rated at 20 percent, with special monthly compensation for loss of use of a creative organ. The claim for an increased evaluation is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The Board has decided that a remand is necessary to determine if the veteran's erectile dysfunction is due to or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board found no evidence of penile deformity associated with the veteran's service-connected erectile dysfunction, and thus denied a compensable evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The veteran's claims for increased evaluation of diabetes mellitus and TDIU were denied, while the claim for reimbursement of ambulance costs was referred to the RO.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The veteran's claim is being remanded for a VA examination to determine the current severity of his impotence and any resulting deformity. The case will be re-adjudicated after the examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2006
The veteran's appeal has been dismissed as he withdrew his appeal regarding the compensable evaluation for service-connected erectile dysfunction secondary to prostate cancer.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected residuals of prostate cancer warrant a 10 percent evaluation prior to April 13, 2004 and a 40 percent evaluation from that date forward. The veteran's bilateral hearing loss does not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The Board has remanded the case to the RO/AMC for further development and consideration, including obtaining a medical opinion regarding the nature and etiology of the veteran's erectile dysfunction and diabetic retinopathy.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The Board has remanded this case for additional development, including obtaining Social Security Administration records and the veteran's VA medical file.
← Back to Erectile dysfunction overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.