Erectile dysfunction decisions — 2021
1,074 indexed Board decisions in 2021.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2021
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction, finding that there was no evidence to support a link between his active military service and his current condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2021
The Board has granted service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to diabetes, but the issue of service connection for scrotal sebaceous cysts is remanded due to inadequate opinion regarding aggravation.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2021
The Veteran is granted a higher rating for SMC under section 1114(o) and awarded two separate ratings of SMC based on loss of use of both feet due to service-connected peripheral neuropathy and need for regular aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · May 2021
The Veteran's prostate cancer, bilateral lower extremity neuropathy, and erectile dysfunction are all granted service connection. The Veteran is also granted special monthly compensation for loss of use of a creative organ due to his ED.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2021
The Veteran's claims for various conditions, including PTSD and several musculoskeletal issues, are being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2021
The Board denied service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to medications taken for a service-connected back condition, finding that the preponderance of evidence did not support that the medication caused or aggravated the Veteran's erectile dysfunction.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2021
The Veteran's service-connected conditions, including PTSD and lower extremity disabilities associated with Parkinson's disease, have resulted in the need for SMC based on loss of use of both feet and aid and attendance. The rating assigned is 50 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2021
The appeal contesting the propriety of the severance of service connection for right ear hearing loss is granted, and restoration of service connection for right ear hearing loss is granted. The appeals regarding diabetes, left upper extremity neuropathy, right upper extremity neuropathy, left lower extremity neuropathy, right lower extremity neuropathy, erectile dysfunction (ED), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and a psychiatric disorder to include posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are all remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2021
The Board has denied the claim of service connection for erectile dysfunction, finding that there is no evidence to support a link between the condition and active service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2021
The Board has granted earlier effective dates of August 5, 2014 for the service connection of prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, hearing loss, and tinnitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2021
The Board has determined that the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is not related to his service-connected conditions, and thus denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2021
The Veteran's claims for service connection for prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction are remanded due to the need for additional development regarding herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2021
The Veteran's claim for SMC-AA was filed on September 11, 2006. The Board granted an effective date of September 11, 2006, but no earlier, for the award of SMC-AA.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2021
The Veteran's current type II diabetes mellitus and tension headaches are found to be proximately due or the result of his service-connected MDD with an adjustment disorder, with obesity serving as an intermediate step between the two disabilities.,The Veteran's obesity is not a qualifying disability for secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2021
The Veteran's claim for an initial disability rating in excess of 20 percent for his service-connected penile disability is denied. The Board found that the Veteran does not meet the criteria for a higher rating as he did not present with atrophy or removal of testes, voiding dysfunction, renal dysfunction, or urinary tract infection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2021
The Board has granted TDIU since October 4, 2016. The case is remanded for consideration of the claim prior to that date under extraschedular criteria.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2021
The Veteran's major depressive disorder is rated at 70 percent, but the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted as total social impairment has not been demonstrated.,Prior to August 7, 2015, the Veteran's migraine headaches are rated at 30 percent. The Board found that very frequent completely prostrating and prolonged attacks were not shown prior to this date.,Since August 7, 2015, the Veteran's migraine headaches are rated at 50 percent, which is the maximum rating under DC 8100.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2021
The Veteran's claim for a total disability based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities is being remanded because new evidence has been added to the file and he was recently awarded service connection for right ear hearing loss and tinnitus. He will be scheduled for VA examinations to assess the impact of his service-connected conditions on his occupational functioning.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2021
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, is currently rated at 20 percent disabling. The Board finds the record against a finding that his treatment required a regulation of activities at any point during the appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2021
The Veteran's service connection for coronary artery disease (CAD) due to herbicide exposure is granted.,An initial disability rating of 20 percent for erectile dysfunction (ED) is granted, effective from June 24, 2014.
← Back to Erectile dysfunction overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.