Erectile dysfunction decisions — 2025

The Board granted service connection for bilateral tinnitus and remanded the claim for a penile condition due to an inadequate VA examination.

The Board remands the claims for service connection for avitaminosis, herpes, and erectile dysfunction as additional development is needed to correct pre-decisional duty to assist errors.

The Board denied service connection for various conditions, including PTSD, sleep apnea, hearing loss, and low back disability, among others. The Veteran's tinnitus was rated at 10 percent, which is the maximum schedular rating available.

The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date for service connection and special monthly compensation, as no evidence supported a claim prior to June 27, 2011.

The Board denied the veteran's claims for an additional or higher level of special monthly compensation based on prostate cancer, a compensable rating for erectile dysfunction, and a compensable rating for the residuals of prostate cancer.

The Board remands the claims for service connection for various disabilities, including erectile dysfunction and spine conditions, to correct pre-decisional duty-to-assist errors.

The Board denied the Veteran's claim for specially adapted housing grant as he does not have a permanent and total disability due to disorders that involve both lower extremities affecting balance or propulsion, which precludes locomotion without assistive devices.

The appeal for service connection for a hand tremor, hypertension, and erectile dysfunction was dismissed due to the Veteran's concurrent election of higher-level review and an appeal to the Board.

The Board remands the claims for service connection for prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction to obtain a TERA memo, a VA examination, and an opinion regarding the likelihood of a nexus between the Veteran's conditions and his service, including potential toxic exposure risk activities.

The Board denied an initial compensable rating for erectile dysfunction and dismissed the issue of special monthly compensation on account of loss of use of a creative organ as moot.

The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for tinnitus, as it is already rated at 10 percent, which is the maximum allowed. The other issues are remanded for further development.

The Board denied all claims for increased ratings for the Veteran's service-connected conditions, including type II diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction and related peripheral vascular disease and neuropathy.

The Board remands the claims for service connection for various disabilities to allow VA to obtain additional evidence, including private treatment records and line of duty determinations.

The Board granted service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to the Veteran's PTSD, but remanded the claim for central sleep apnea due to an inadequate medical opinion.

The Board denied a rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus type II with bilateral preoperative cataracts, erectile dysfunction, and dermatophytosis.

The Board denied the Veteran's claims for an earlier effective date for service connection for erectile dysfunction and special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ, as there was no evidence of an unadjudicated claim prior to September 1, 2010.

The Board dismissed the appeals for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, migraine headaches, erectile dysfunction, a left shoulder condition, and a neck condition, as well as an earlier effective date claim regarding PTSD. The claims for carpal tunnel syndrome and shin splints were denied, while other claims were remanded.

The appeal regarding service connection for erectile dysfunction was dismissed due to a procedural error in filing multiple Notices of Disagreement.

The Board remands the claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction, as secondary to lumbosacral strain, due to a duty to assist error and an incomplete medical opinion.

The Board denied the applications to revise a March 2021 rating decision based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE) for various claims of service connection, finding no evidence that the correct facts were not before the RO or that the applicable statutory and regulatory provisions were incorrectly applied.