Erectile dysfunction Board decisions

The Veteran was denied service connection for diabetic retinopathy and higher ratings for diabetes mellitus, Type II with nephropathy and erectile dysfunction as well as PTSD.

The Veteran is not entitled to a higher rate of SMC for loss of use of a creative organ as the statutory and regulatory rates are fixed.

The Veteran's diabetes does not require regulation of activities, and the associated complications do not warrant a higher rating.

The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, erectile dysfunction secondary to PTSD, and an increased rating for headaches.

The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied as the evidence did not support a higher evaluation or grant of service connection.

The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II, finding no evidence that the condition was caused by or aggravated by the diabetes.

The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction, finding that it was not related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus disability. The claims for increased evaluations of lumbosacral strain and diabetic peripheral neuropathy were remanded for further development.

The Board remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension, kidney disease, and erectile dysfunction to obtain an opinion on whether these conditions were caused or aggravated by the Veteran's service-connected diabetes.

The Board denied service connection for prostate cancer with residual erectile dysfunction, recurrent urinary tract infections, and incontinence, as well as bilateral posterior subcapsular cataracts, finding that the evidence did not support a link to ionizing radiation exposure during active service.

The appeals for initial compensable ratings and effective dates were withdrawn, leaving the TDIU claim as the only issue. The Veteran was granted a 100% disability rating for PTSD on April 3, 2008, making the TDIU claim moot.

The appeal is remanded to the RO for additional development, including a VA examination.

The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for sexual dysfunction, erectile dysfunction, was denied as there is no evidence of penile deformity.

The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied, except for erectile dysfunction which was granted a 20 percent rating. Service connection for PTSD was also granted.

The veteran's service-connected disabilities, including diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy, have rendered him unemployable.

The Board denied service connection for scoliosis and an initial compensable evaluation for erectile dysfunction.

The appeal is remanded for further development to verify the Veteran's claimed exposure to herbicides, specifically Agent Orange.

The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, Type II and related conditions due to a lack of evidence supporting the claims.

The Veteran's claims for higher initial ratings and service connection were denied as the evidence did not support a finding of entitlement to any of the claimed conditions.

The Board denied service connection for erectile dysfunction as there was no evidence of a link between the condition and active service or any incident therein.

The Board denied service connection for PTSD, diabetes mellitus, heart problems and hypertension, circulation problems affecting the right side and legs, erectile dysfunction, and eye problems as they were not shown to be related to the Veteran's active military service.