Erectile dysfunction Board decisions

The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ was denied as there is no legal basis for such an award.

The Board found that the veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, hypertension, and erectile dysfunction were not incurred in or related to service.

The veteran's service-connected disabilities, including diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, are found to be so severe that they prevent him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.

The case is being remanded for the following: (1) obtaining outstanding Social Security Administration (SSA) disability records that may be relevant to the issues on appeal and (2) providing notification in compliance with Kent v. Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 1 (2006).

The veteran's case is being remanded to the RO for scheduling a travel or videoconference hearing before the Board at the RO due to his failure to appear in December 2007.

The veteran's appeal involves disagreement with the initial 20 percent disability rating assigned for his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II, with associated complications. The Board has remanded the case to allow for further development and consideration of whether a higher rating is warranted on an extra-schedular basis.

The veteran's erectile dysfunction has been manifested by loss of erectile power, but no penile deformity has been shown. As such, the criteria for a compensable rating have not been met.

The Board has determined that the veteran's erectile dysfunction, secondary to his service-connected prostate cancer, does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating due to lack of evidence of penis deformity.

The VA denied the veteran's claim for an initial higher rating for his service-connected erectile dysfunction, finding that it did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating.

The Board has remanded the case for further development and medical opinions to determine the etiology of the veteran's erectile dysfunction, including whether it is related to service-connected conditions or exposure to Agent Orange.

The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for COPD, shell fragment wounds to his right knee and head, and residuals from those injuries. The Board also found that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen a claim for atrophied testicles with erectile dysfunction.

The veteran's diabetes mellitus is currently rated as 20 percent disabling. The issues of increased ratings for diabetic neuropathy and erectile dysfunction are remanded.

The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a right knee disability and prostate disorder with erectile dysfunction, finding that there was no evidence of such conditions during his period of active service or within one year following separation.,The veteran's assertions regarding the onset of these conditions were not supported by medical evidence.

The VA has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction and assigned an initial 20 percent rating, effective April 29, 2004. The veteran's condition requires daily insulin injections and restrictions in his diet but does not require regulation of activities.

The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of any psychiatric disability, diabetic retinopathy (blurred vision), chloracne and porphyria cutanea, or peripheral neuropathy of both upper extremities for purposes of establishing service connection.,Regarding erectile dysfunction, the evidence is insufficient to establish its etiology.

The Board has determined that the veteran's skin cancer, hypertension, paresthesia of fingers/toes, renal artery atherosclerotic disease, CAD, and erectile dysfunction are not service-connected or secondary to service.

The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected erectile dysfunction does not warrant a compensable rating.

The Board has determined that the appellant's erectile dysfunction was not incurred or aggravated in service and is not attributable to a service-connected disease or injury. Therefore, the claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction is denied.

The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for depression, breathing problems (including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and rhinitis), erectile dysfunction, neck disability, sleep apnea, and increased rating for chronic back strain. The decision also addressed whether new and material evidence had been received to reopen previously denied claims.

The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including obtaining a VA examination and considering all theories of entitlement. The issues of service connection for erectile dysfunction and special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ are inextricably intertwined.