Erectile dysfunction Board decisions

The Board has granted the severance of service connection for diabetes mellitus and denied the claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction.

The Veteran's claims for service connection for impetigo, diabetes mellitus type II, coronary artery disease, and hypertension have been granted. The claim for acquired psychiatric disorder (including depression) is remanded.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for erectile dysfunction and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities are also remanded.

The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to inadequate prior VA examination and issues of inextricability between the psychiatric disability and erectile dysfunction.

The Board has remanded the claims for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, retinopathy, headaches, erectile dysfunction, insomnia, and skin disability of the feet due to inadequate medical opinions in the previous VA examinations. The Veteran's service connection claims are being remanded for further development.

The Board is remanding the case to determine if the Veteran had a diagnosis of Erectile Dysfunction (ED) during his period of service and, if so, its likely etiology.

The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is granted as secondary to his service-connected Other Specified Trauma and Stressor Related Disorder. The claim for PTSD was denied due to lack of a current diagnosis.

The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, prostate cancer, urinary bladder cancer, and erectile dysfunction (ED) as secondary to exposure to Agent Orange. The evidence did not establish that the Veteran was exposed to Agent Orange in Vietnam or its offshore waters.

The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction as aggravated by his service-connected bladder cancer. The urologist opined that the Veteran's surgery to remove his bladder and prostate exacerbated his erectile dysfunction.

The Board has remanded the case due to a duty to assist error, and now requires the Director, Compensation Service, to consider whether a TDIU should be granted on an extraschedular basis prior to May 30, 2019.

The appeal for service connection for bladder cancer is dismissed. The issue of entitlement to special monthly compensation (SMC) based on loss of use of a creative organ related to service-connected bladder cancer is remanded.

The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to inconsistencies in the location of his vessel, the U.S.S. Intrepid, during his service aboard it on November 6, 1967.

The Board denied the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to a claimed infection and residuals from VA medical care, finding that the proximate cause of the additional disability was not reasonably foreseeable.

The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not prevent him from securing and following substantially gainful employment prior to January 13, 2011.

The Board has dismissed all claims for service connection due to the Veteran's death.

The Board has remanded the claims for bilateral upper and lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, heart disorder, and GERD due to potential issues with the opinions provided. The ED claim is also remanded as it is intertwined with the underlying conditions.

The Veteran's claims for service connection have been denied as the evidence does not support a finding that any of these conditions began in service or are related to service.,New and relevant evidence has not been submitted to support the Veteran's claims for service connection.

The Veteran's claim for service connection for sinus nasal passage issues was denied as there is no evidence of a current diagnosis related to any in-service injury or disease.,The Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic cataracts and erectile dysfunction was rated at 20 percent, which is the maximum rating available under Diagnostic Code 7913.

The Board has determined that the severance of service connection for prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction was improper, and thus restored service connection for these conditions.

The Board denied service connection for erectile dysfunction, finding that the evidence did not support a link between the condition and active duty service.

The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for erectile dysfunction, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and a psychiatric disorder due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to his service or service-connected disabilities.