Erectile dysfunction Board decisions

The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions and procedural issues. A new secondary service connection opinion is needed based on accurate factual history, including consideration of all Veteran's service-connected disabilities.

The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for hypertension is denied, and his claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction is remanded.

The Veteran's appeal for a rating in excess of 10 percent for traumatic brain injury prior to February 15, 2014 was denied as the evidence did not show any manifestations worse than level 1 impairment.,The Veteran's appeal for a compensable rating for erectile dysfunction was denied because he already had a compensable rating based on loss of use of a creative organ.

The Board has remanded the case due to inconsistencies in personnel records and a need for additional development regarding the Veteran's service in Vietnam. Both prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction claims are now pending.

The Veteran's service connection claims for various conditions, including back condition, left heel injury, vertigo, sleep apnea, dyslipidemia, erectile dysfunction, prostatic hypertrophy, basal cell carcinoma, and Parkinson's (also claimed as essential tremors), have been denied. The Board found no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.

The Veteran's claims for higher ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions.

The Board has granted service connection for erectile dysfunction, which is secondary to the Veteran's service-connected hypertension.

The Board has reopened the previously denied claim of entitlement to service connection for removal of left testicle due to in-service injury. Service connection is granted for this condition. The claims of entitlement to service connection for diabetes mellitus, erectile dysfunction, and diabetic peripheral neuropathy are remanded as they are inextricably intertwined with the determination regarding the removal of left testicle.

The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to Gulf War illness for additional examinations and opinions regarding his claimed conditions, including genetic autoimmune disorders, joint pain, uveitis, and erectile dysfunction.

The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's erectile dysfunction, finding that it is proximately due to his service-connected peripheral neuropathy.

The Board has determined that the VA examinations and opinions are inadequate for adjudicating the Veteran's claim, and thus the case must be remanded for further examination and opinion.

The Board has granted service connection for hemochromatosis. The remaining claims of service connection for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, erectile dysfunction, and non-alcoholic fatty liver are remanded for additional medical opinions.

The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for various disabilities, including testicular, bladder, erectile dysfunction, shoulder, and radiculopathy. The VA will obtain all relevant records and schedule a VA examination.

The Board has determined that the grant of service connection for erectile dysfunction with Peyronie's disease was not clearly and unmistakably erroneous, and thus the appeal is granted. The Veteran's current diagnoses are related to his diabetes mellitus.

The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's service connection claims, including those for kidney disability, gastrointestinal disability, prostate disability, hypertension, and erectile dysfunction. The reasons for these remands include insufficient medical opinions regarding herbicide agent exposure and other relevant factors.

The Board has remanded the case due to procedural errors and additional evidence needs to be considered before a final decision can be made on the TDIU claim.

The Board has granted service connection for prostate cancer on a presumptive basis due to exposure to Agent Orange during active duty in Korea. The claim for erectile dysfunction secondary to prostate cancer is remanded for further evaluation.

The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for hypertension and erectile dysfunction due to service connection issues. The cases are now pending further development.

The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's service connection claim for erectile dysfunction, specifically his in-service electric shock.

The Veteran's claims for service connection have been denied for bilateral hearing loss, type II diabetes mellitus, kidney disorder (to include secondary to type II diabetes mellitus), and bilateral eye disorder (to include secondary to type II diabetes mellitus). The remaining issues are remanded for further development.