Erectile dysfunction Board decisions

The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is not service-connected and is not caused or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.,The Veteran has peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity that is proximately due to his service connected diabetes mellitus.,The Veteran has peripheral neuropathy of the right upper extremity that is proximately due to his service connected diabetes mellitus.,The Veteran has peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity that is proximately due to his service connected diabetes mellitus.,The Veteran has peripheral neuropathy of the left upper extremity that is proximately due to his service connected diabetes mellitus.

The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a TDIU prior to November 28, 2006, on an extraschedular basis due to lack of evidence showing that his service-connected disabilities alone or in combination precluded him from securing and maintaining substantially gainful employment.

The Board has remanded the case for further development due to inadequate consideration of the Veteran's claims regarding prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction, including exposure at Camp Lejeune.

The Veteran's hypertension and ED are not rated higher than non-compensable.,Tension headaches are rated at 30 percent, but the Veteran does not meet criteria for a higher rating.

The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for erectile dysfunction and prostate cancer residuals prior to March 26, 2019 were denied. The claim for a rating in excess of 40 percent for prostate cancer from March 26, 2019 was also denied.

The Board has remanded several issues for further development and consideration, including obtaining additional medical records and readjudicating the service connection claims. The appeals are not about service connection via a presumption like PACT Act/Agent Orange/Camp Lejeune.

The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, was not incurred as a result of active duty service and is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to an in-service event, injury, or disease.,The preponderance of the evidence shows that the Veteran’s peripheral neuropathy was not manifest during active service and is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to an in-service event, injury, or disease.,The preponderance of the evidence shows that the Veteran's erectile dysfunction was not manifest during active service and is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to an in-service event, injury, or disease.,The preponderance of the evidence shows that the Veteran’s eye disability was not manifest during active service and is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to an in-service event, injury, or disease.,The preponderance of the evidence shows that the Veteran's arthritis of the shoulders, back, hips and feet was not manifest during active service and is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to an in-service event, injury, or disease.,The preponderance of the evidence shows that the Veteran’s vertigo was not manifest during active service and is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to an in-service event, injury, or disease.,The preponderance of the evidence shows that the Veteran's pancreatic cancer was not manifest during active service and is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to an in-service event, injury, or disease.

The Veteran's claim for erectile dysfunction and right knee disability secondary to service-connected disabilities have been granted. The issue of entitlement to service connection for a right knee disability is remanded.

From December 10, 2015, the Veteran was found to be unable to secure or maintain substantially gainful employment due to service-connected disabilities.

The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for erectile dysfunction, bilateral hearing loss, and PTSD due to new evidence not being received. The Veteran's claim for PTSD is pending as VA treatment records are needed.

The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus and erectile dysfunction. The decision found that there was no evidence of a nexus between these conditions and service, with the exception of tinnitus which may be presumed related to in-service noise exposure.

The Veteran's claims for higher ratings for his service-connected cervical spine, hypertension, and ED disabilities are denied. The claim for a bilateral ankle disorder is remanded due to the need for additional examination.

The Veteran's claim for a compensable disability rating for erectile dysfunction was denied as there is no evidence of penile deformity, which is required for a compensable evaluation under the applicable diagnostic code.

The Veteran's PTSD symptoms did not meet the criteria for a disability rating in excess of 50 percent prior to November 13, 2019 and in excess of 70 percent thereafter.,Service connection for erectile dysfunction is remanded due to lack of an opinion on etiology.,Service connection for diabetes mellitus secondary to service-connected PTSD is remanded due to lack of an opinion on etiology.,Service connection for high cholesterol secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus is remanded due to lack of an opinion on etiology.,The Veteran's lumbar spine degenerative disc disease was not rated higher than 40 percent prior to November 13, 2019 and in excess of 70 percent thereafter.,Service connection for left lower extremity femoral nerve peripheral neuropathy is remanded due to lack of an opinion on etiology.,Service connection for right lower extremity femoral nerve peripheral neuropathy is remanded due to lack of an opinion on etiology.,Service connection for left lower extremity sciatic nerve peripheral neuropathy is remanded due to lack of an opinion on etiology.,Service connection for right lower extremity neuralgia parenthetical is remanded due to lack of an opinion on etiology.

The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for initial compensable ratings for left testicular atrophy with hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction associated with vasectomy-related genital trauma due to inadequate development of the evidentiary record.

The Board has granted service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, to include PTSD and unspecified anxiety disorder. The claims of service connection for prostate cancer, hypertension, and erectile dysfunction as secondary to prostate cancer are remanded.

The Board has determined that the remand directives have not been substantially complied with, and a remand for full compliance with the Board's prior remand is warranted as a matter of law.

Your claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to diabetes mellitus, type II has already been granted and there is no further controversy.

The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction, finding that there was no evidence to support a causal relationship between his condition and service or any service-connected disability.

The Board denied service connection for hypertension and erectile dysfunction as secondary to the service-connected type II diabetes mellitus, finding no evidence of a nexus between these conditions and the diabetes.