Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
21,351 vetted Board decisions for Erectile dysfunction.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection of erectile dysfunction and right wrist disability as secondary to his service-connected left wrist disability. The Board found that there was no evidence linking these conditions to his service or a service-connected condition.,Regarding the left shoulder and right shoulder disabilities, the Board has remanded the cases due to insufficient medical opinions regarding whether they are caused by or aggravated by the Veteran's service-connected left wrist disability.
The Veteran's duodenal ulcers are related to service, and the Board has granted service connection for this condition. The cardiovascular disability claim is remanded due to insufficient evidence on herbicide exposure. The erectile dysfunction claim is also remanded as no opinion was provided regarding its relationship with prostate cancer.
The Board has remanded the service connection claims for obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, erectile dysfunction, and diabetes mellitus as secondary to a service-connected status post thyroidectomy due to lack of examination.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD, diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, and erectile dysfunction, are causing him significant functional impairment. The Board has ordered additional examinations to assess his current disability status and its impact on employment.
The Board has granted service connection for bipolar disorder and remanded the remaining issues of service connection for other conditions. The Veteran's current bilateral shoulder disorders, lumbar spine disorder, sleep disorder, tinnitus, and erectile dysfunction are presumed to have originated in service.
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for a reproductive organ disability, to include prostate cancer and a skin disability is being remanded due to incomplete medical opinions. The Board requested additional information on the nature and etiology of any diagnosed disabilities.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for various conditions, including diabetes mellitus, diabetic neuropathy, dyslipidemia, hypothyroidism, and erectile dysfunction. The Board found that there was no evidence to support a direct link between these conditions and the Veteran's military service.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have met the percentage requirements for a TDIU, and his education and occupational experience qualify him to perform gainful employment. The Board finds that reasonable doubt must be resolved in favor of the Veteran due to his unemployability caused by his service-connected conditions.
The Veteran's application to reopen a claim for tinnitus was granted, and he is now entitled to service connection for this condition.,His right foot condition and left foot condition were denied as not incurred in active service. The tongue tumor, hiatal hernia with acid reflux, erectile dysfunction, benign prostate hypertrophy, and stomach polyps were also denied due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for Erectile Dysfunction, finding that there is no evidence to support a nexus between his current condition and his military service or any service-connected disabilities.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient opinion regarding whether service-connected coronary artery disease and/or diabetes mellitus, type II aggravated the Veteran's erectile dysfunction (ED).
The Board has vacated its previous decisions and remanded the case for further development to determine if the Veteran's prostate cancer, ischemic heart disease, and erectile dysfunction are related to herbicide exposure or caused by prostate cancer.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for initial compensable ratings for erectile dysfunction and prostate cancer residuals, finding that there was no evidence of penile deformity or significant voiding dysfunction to warrant a higher rating.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevent him from securing or following substantially gainful employment, and the Board has granted a TDIU based on this.
The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, and lymph node disability. The remand includes obtaining medical opinions regarding the etiology of these conditions and their relationship to service-connected colon cancer residuals.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a higher rating in excess of 50 percent for PTSD and for TDIU due to service-connected disabilities. The VA must obtain all outstanding VA treatment records, including those scanned into the imaging system.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for gall bladder disorder, kidney disorder, erectile dysfunction, prostate disorder, and hypertension, all of which were not found to be related to active service or exposure to herbicides.
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for various conditions, including a cardiac disorder and diabetes mellitus type II, due to exposure to herbicide agents. The issues are related as they all involve secondary service connection.
The Board has granted the Veteran's petition to reopen his claim of service connection for a left knee disorder and has remanded several issues related to his right big toe fracture residuals, left ankle sprain, right ankle sprain, right knee arthritis, and lumbar strain.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities, as well as erectile dysfunction, all secondary to his service-connected type II diabetes mellitus. The decision also remanded the issue of a disability rating in excess of 30 percent for anxiety disorder, NOS.
← Back to Erectile dysfunction overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.