Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
21,351 vetted Board decisions for Erectile dysfunction.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not prevent him from securing or following substantially gainful employment, and therefore, he is not entitled to a TDIU.
The Board has granted service connection for erectile dysfunction, rendering the appeal moot and dismissed.
The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is granted an initial 20% disability rating, effective May 12, 2020. The TDIU claim from June 25, 2014 to November 16, 2015 is denied as the Veteran was gainfully employed prior to his last full-time employment on November 16, 2015. SMC at the housebound rate under 38 U.S.C. § 1114(s) from November 17, 2015 is also denied.
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been reopened, but the Board has determined that additional development is needed to properly adjudicate these claims.
The Board has denied a separate rating for erectile dysfunction associated with service-connected degenerative disc disease with IVDS and laminectomy, finding that the Veteran's condition is not related to his back disability. The case is being remanded for additional development.,The Board has also denied a separate rating for urinary incontinence associated with service-connected degenerative disc disease with IVDS and laminectomy, based on an initial VA examination report which did not address all inquiries. The case is being remanded again for further evaluation.
The Veteran's prostate cancer residuals are rated at 20 percent, which is the maximum rating available under Diagnostic Code 7528 for voiding dysfunction.,The Veteran's erectile dysfunction with absence of ejaculation associated with prostate cancer is currently rated as noncompensable.
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and an addendum opinion regarding the etiology of any diagnosed bilateral leg condition, bilateral hearing loss, and erectile dysfunction. The Veteran's claims are currently pending.
The Board has decided that additional development is needed before the appeal can be adjudicated, specifically an additional VA examination and opinion to address the etiology of the Veteran's erectile dysfunction.
The Board has granted service connection for headaches and remanded the remaining issues including increased ratings, PTSD evaluation, esophageal stricture rating, and erectile dysfunction.
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings are being remanded due to scheduling issues with VA examinations.
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction due to new and material evidence, but has remanded it for further development as an adequate medical opinion is needed.
The Board has granted service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to treatment for the Veteran's service-connected PTSD.
The Veteran's hypertension, bilateral hearing loss disability, tinnitus, hepatitis C with cirrhosis of the liver, gastroesophageal disability (including GERD and Barrett's esophagus), heart disability other than CAD (paroxysmal atrial fibrillation), and erectile dysfunction are all granted. However, due to insufficient evidence, several issues related to these conditions have been remanded for further development.
Service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II is granted. An effective date earlier than February 17, 2010 for the grant of service connection for coronary artery disease is denied. Service connection for hypertension, erectile dysfunction, and peripheral neuropathy secondary to diabetes mellitus, type II is remanded.
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension and erectile dysfunction, with hypertension being linked to herbicide exposure in Vietnam. Erectile dysfunction is also found to be related to the Veteran's hypertension.
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for further action on service connection claims, including a claim for cause of death. No other issues have been resolved.
The Board denied service connection for ischemic heart disease, prostate cancer, diabetes mellitus, and erectile dysfunction due to a lack of evidence linking these conditions to the Veteran's military service or exposure to herbicide agents. The Board found that the preponderance of evidence did not support the claims.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for Erectile Dysfunction was denied because there is no evidence of a disease or injury incurred in or aggravated by active service, and the current condition did not manifest during his military service.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for ED as secondary to PTSD is reopened, and the case is remanded for a VA examination. The pituitary disorder case is also remanded.
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for type II diabetes mellitus, diabetic neuropathy, and erectile dysfunction due to herbicide exposure. The case is returned to the AOJ for further development.
← Back to Erectile dysfunction overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.