Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
21,351 vetted Board decisions for Erectile dysfunction.
The Veteran's complications following prostate cancer surgery are not deemed to be the result of VA carelessness, negligence or error. However, there is a finding that adequate post-surgery care and follow-up was lacking.
The Veteran's service-connected psychiatric disorder, diabetes mellitus with hypertension, diabetic retinopathy with loss of visual acuity and fields, and erectile dysfunction have rendered him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment. Effective January 5, 2011, the Veteran is granted special monthly compensation at the housebound rate due to his service-connected disabilities.
The Board has granted service connection for erectile dysfunction, a 100% rating for major depression, and increased ratings for the Veteran's lumbar spine disability and hypertension. The issue of TDIU based solely on the service-connected lumbar spine disorder is also granted.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and opinions regarding the relationship between the Veteran's service-connected disabilities and his erectile dysfunction.
The Board found that the Veteran's death was not caused by any service-connected conditions, and denied the claim for service connection for cause of death.
The Veteran's PTSD disability is currently rated at 70 percent, effective from April 1, 2009. The Board has granted a TDIU based on the Veteran's service-connected PTSD.
The Board has ordered additional development due to the need for an addendum opinion regarding whether the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is aggravated by his service-connected epididymitis, and for obtaining updated VA treatment records.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a hearing. The Veteran's claims of service connection for various conditions are pending.
The Veteran's appeals have been dismissed due to his withdrawal of the appeal prior to a decision being made.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including verification of Reserve service periods and obtaining a VA examination to determine if diabetes mellitus originated during active service or a period of ACDUTRA.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including schizoaffective disorder and bilateral inguinal hernias, do not prevent him from engaging in substantially gainful employment. He is rated at 100% for schizoaffective disorder since December 20, 2013, but his other disabilities are rated less than 60%. The Board denied the TDIU claim.
The Veteran is seeking an initial compensable evaluation for his erectile dysfunction. The Board observes that the Veteran's service-connected erectile dysfunction is already compensated for an inability to perform sexual intercourse with a special monthly compensation based on the loss of use of a creative organ. However, he asserts total impotence and deformity of the penis following September 2008 surgery for prostate cancer.
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn, and the case is dismissed.
The Veteran's prostate cancer is presumed to have been incurred by service due to herbicide exposure. The Board has granted service connection for prostate cancer, but the issue of erectile dysfunction remains pending as it was not raised in his appeal.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities preclude him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied as the evidence did not support a finding of direct or secondary service connection for any of the claimed conditions.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension was denied as there was no evidence to support a finding of direct service connection.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for decreased kidney function was denied as there was no evidence to support a finding of direct or secondary service connection.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for anemia was denied as there was no evidence to support a finding of direct or secondary service connection.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for sexual dysfunction (erectile dysfunction) was denied as there was no evidence to support a finding of direct or secondary service connection.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea was denied as there was no evidence to support a finding of direct service connection.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for gastrointestinal disability (GERD) was denied as there was no evidence to support a finding of direct or secondary service connection.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for sixth cranial nerve palsy was denied as the evidence did not support a finding of direct or secondary service connection.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetic retinopathy was denied as there was no evidence to support a finding of direct service connection.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetic peripheral neuropathy was denied as there was no evidence to support a finding of direct service connection.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service connection claims require additional information and evidence, specifically regarding his exposure to herbicides during service. The case is being remanded for further action.
The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 30 percent from July 6, 2010 to the present. His erectile dysfunction does not meet criteria for a compensable rating. The Veteran's service-connected disabilities combine to a 100 percent rating no earlier than July 10, 2008.
The Board has determined that the Veteran is not entitled to a compensable rating for erectile dysfunction as there is no evidence of penile deformity, which is required under Diagnostic Code 7522. The Veteran's condition is already rated based on loss of use of a creative organ.
← Back to Erectile dysfunction overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.