Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
21,351 vetted Board decisions for Erectile dysfunction.
The Veteran's combined rating for his service-connected disabilities is 90%, which meets the minimum percentage requirements for a TDIU. However, he has been employed in a protected environment and currently earns income that exceeds the poverty threshold for one person. The evidence does not show that his service-connected conditions render him unemployable.
The Veteran's claim for a TDIU was denied as he failed to provide sufficient information and evidence to establish that his service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to obtain and sustain a substantial gainful occupation.
The Board has determined that additional medical opinions are needed to address whether the Veteran's service-connected diabetes and coronary artery disease have aggravated his erectile dysfunction, as well as any outstanding VA treatment records should be obtained.
The Board has granted a higher initial disability rating of 50 percent for PTSD, finding that the Veteran's symptoms more nearly approximate occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity.
The Veteran's prostate cancer and its residuals are presumed to be the result of exposure to herbicides in service, thus meeting the criteria for service connection.
The Veteran's persistent depressive disorder is found to have been incurred in service, with the Board resolving reasonable doubt in his favor.,While the Veteran has erectile dysfunction, it was not caused or aggravated by diabetes mellitus. The examiner opined that hypogonadism may be more likely the cause of his erectile dysfunction.,New and material evidence sufficient to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss has been received.
The Veteran's service-connected residual of prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction are currently rated at the maximum available evaluations. The Board finds no basis for higher ratings.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's erectile dysfunction and whether it is related to service-connected diabetes mellitus.
The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is found to be proximately due to or the result of his already service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II. As a result, the claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction is granted.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including left upper and lower extremity disability, left hand sweats, and erectile dysfunction associated with a cerebrovascular accident, are rated at the 20 percent level.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for service connection and increased evaluation have been denied. The hearing loss claim is not in appellate status as it was previously granted.
The Board found no evidence of shoulder injury or disease during service, and the Veteran did not present any credible argument to support his claim. As a result, the claims for service connection for shoulder arthritis, hypertension, heart disability, and erectile dysfunction were denied.
The Board has determined that additional development is needed in order to properly adjudicate the Veteran's claims, including obtaining VA treatment records and worker's compensation records. The Veteran will be scheduled for a VA examination to address his ED, low back disability, and bilateral knee disability.
The Board denied increased ratings for diabetes mellitus, right and left upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, and TDIU prior to September 16, 2014. The Veteran's service-connected conditions were found not to meet the criteria for higher ratings.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for erectile dysfunction, bilateral flat feet, GERD, and arthritis of the right knee and leg. The claim for GERD was reopened but still denied. The other claims were not reopened.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is attributable to his service-connected hypertension and grants service connection for this condition.
The Veteran's claim for a higher level of special monthly compensation due to need for aid and attendance is being remanded as additional examination is needed to assess the extent of his service-connected disabilities.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were granted, with the exception of his claim for a bilateral eye disorder. The initial rating for diabetes mellitus was confirmed at 20 percent, and he received an initial compensable rating for amputation of the left second toe.
The Veteran's appeal has been remanded due to the need for additional development of his claims, including obtaining pertinent medical records and issuing a Statement of the Case (SOC) addressing all issues on appeal.
The Veteran's service-connected conditions, including amputation of both lower extremities and other disabilities such as posttraumatic stress disorder, right shoulder rotator cuff tear, sarcoma of the nose, penile deformity with erectile dysfunction and voiding dysfunction, left upper extremity fragment wound with retained foreign body, buttock fragment wound with retained foreign body, left shoulder rotator cuff tear, diabetes mellitus, left wrist fragment wound, coronary artery disease, and tinnitus, have resulted in a need for higher level of care. The Veteran's condition necessitates the provision of daily personal health care services by a skilled provider without which he would require institutional care.
← Back to Erectile dysfunction overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.