Erectile dysfunction Board decisions

The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied. His right leg PVD was rated at 20 percent prior to September 2011 and 60 percent thereafter, his left leg PVD was rated at 20 percent prior to September 2011 and 60 percent thereafter, his erectile dysfunction is rated noncompensably (0%), and his bilateral nuclear cataracts and open angle glaucoma are each rated at 10 percent. The Veteran's TDIU claim was not listed as an issue.

The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him incapable of performing the physical and mental acts required for employment, considering his education and occupational experience.

The Board has determined that the evidence is at least in equipoise as to whether the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is caused by his service-connected central nervous system and major depressive disorders, thus granting service connection for this condition.

The Board has decided to remand the case for further development and an addendum VA opinion regarding the Veteran's claim of service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to his service-connected conditions.

The Veteran's coronary artery disease, prostate cancer, and erectile dysfunction were not present during service or for many years thereafter and are not otherwise etiologically related to service.

The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including obtaining VA and private medical records, securing SSA disability benefits application records, and scheduling a VA social and industrial survey.

The Veteran's appeal for a rating in excess of 10 percent prior to July 1, 2012, and in excess of zero percent thereafter for bilateral hearing loss has been withdrawn.,The claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction was reopened due to the submission of new evidence suggesting a link between the condition and service.

The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development and an examination.

The Board has granted service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to diabetes mellitus type II, but denied service connection for hypertension.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's current erectile dysfunction is not related to his active service or a service-connected disability, and thus denied his claim for service connection.

The Veteran's service connection claim for a disability manifested by uncontrollable body shakes is denied as there is no evidence of any neurological disorder or other ascertainable chronic disability. The Veteran's TDIU claim is also denied as his service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is not service-connected and does not warrant a compensable rating as it is attributed to his non-service connected Peyronie's disease.

The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a Travel Board hearing at the RO.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is not caused or aggravated by his service-connected varicose veins, postoperative with thrombophlebitis of the right lower extremity. The evidence does not support a finding that this condition is related to service.

The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical evidence of record to decide whether a TDIU is warranted.

The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining a copy of an affidavit from Mr. G.C., III.

The Board denied service connection for the claimed conditions, finding that they were not incurred or aggravated by active military service and are not related to inservice malaria or exposure to Agent Orange.

The Veteran's appeal for a compensable rating for erectile dysfunction was denied as there is no evidence of any penile deformity, and the current level of disability does not warrant a higher rating.

The Board has granted the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for erectile dysfunction, finding that it is secondary to his service-connected low back disorder.

The Veteran requested to withdraw his appeal, and the Board dismissed the case as a result.