Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
21,351 vetted Board decisions for Erectile dysfunction.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II and erectile dysfunction are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including VA examinations.
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and a VA examination to assess his employability due to service-connected disabilities.
The Veteran's claims for a compensable evaluation for erectile dysfunction, service connection for proctitis and rectal impairment due to nerve damage secondary to radiation therapy for treatment of prostate cancer, VA compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of an injury of the right and left lower quadriceps tendons, status-post surgical repair, and VA compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of a left foot injury have all been denied.
The Veteran's claim for beneficiary travel reimbursement is being remanded. The Board will attempt to obtain the Veteran's initial claim for these benefits and then readjudicate his service connection claims.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's obesity, erectile dysfunction, diabetes mellitus type I, hypertension, lumbar spine strain, and right knee DJD are proximately due to his service-connected lower extremity disabilities.
The Veteran's service-connected conditions render him in need of regular aid and attendance, with the exception of his diabetic neuropathy which does not require it.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records and a new VA examination. The claims will be reconsidered based on all evidence.
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 40 percent, the maximum schedular rating available. The Veteran's erectile dysfunction does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected erectile dysfunction does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating due to lack of penile deformity, and thus denied his claim.
The Veteran is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected prostate cancer and related disabilities, which rendered him unemployable. The Board has granted the claim for TDIU.
The Veteran's prostate cancer and associated erectile dysfunction are not service-connected due to lack of evidence supporting exposure to herbicides or other causative factors.
The Veteran's claims for higher initial evaluations for various service-connected conditions, including diabetes mellitus and its associated peripheral neuropathy and erectile dysfunction, as well as tinnitus, were denied. The claim for a TDIU is also on appeal.
The Veteran's erectile dysfunction, which is service-connected, qualifies for special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not prevent him from obtaining or retaining substantially gainful employment.
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death. The claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II is moot.
The Board found that the Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of Prinzmetal's angina and denied service connection for it. The skin disorder claim was reopened based on new evidence, but service connection is granted only for intertrigo of the groin. For diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction, the rating remains at 20 percent prior to April 28, 2011, and increases to 20 percent from that date.
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims for service connection for multiple sclerosis and erectile dysfunction, but dismissed his claims for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, urinary complications, and an acquired psychiatric disability (claimed as depression or anxiety).
The Board found no evidence of in-service exposure to Agent Orange or herbicides, and thus denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II. The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy and erectile dysfunction were not shown to be related to his active duty service.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is causally related to, or aggravated by, a service-connected disability (low back strain), and thus grants service connection for this condition.
The Veteran's appeal for a TDIU is being remanded due to the need for additional VA examination and development of medical records. The Board will determine if his service-connected disabilities preclude him from securing and maintaining substantially gainful employment.
← Back to Erectile dysfunction overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.