Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
21,351 vetted Board decisions for Erectile dysfunction.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been received to reopen the previously denied claims of service connection for a visual disability, residuals of a head injury, and left knee disability. The claim for diabetes mellitus is granted.,The claim for erectile dysfunction was not incurred in active service and is not secondary to a service-connected disability.
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and erectile dysfunction are all found to be service-connected due to herbicide exposure during active duty.
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and opinions regarding his claimed disabilities.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's depression is proximately due to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II with erectile dysfunction.
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for service connection for bladder cancer, residuals of prostate surgery, erectile dysfunction, and entitlement to a TDIU.
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type 2, with erectile dysfunction was rated at 20 percent and the claim for a higher rating is denied.
The Veteran's claimed conditions of diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and erectile dysfunction are not service-connected as they are not related to his military service.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied as the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating under the applicable diagnostic codes.
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II with erectile dysfunction has been managed by the use of insulin and an oral hypoglycemic agent. Regulation of activities was not required to control diabetes for the entire initial rating period.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not preclude him from obtaining and maintaining all forms of substantially gainful employment.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a respiratory condition (also claimed as allergies) has been reopened and is now considered. The Board finds that the additional evidence received since the November 2006 rating decision relates to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claim, specifically whether the current respiratory condition was incurred in or aggravated by service.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied. The Board found that the maximum schedular evaluation of 10 percent was assigned for tinnitus and there is no provision for separate evaluations for bilateral tinnitus.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for sleep apnea and erectile dysfunction, finding that there is no evidence linking these conditions to his active duty service or a service-connected disability.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to the need for a VA medical opinion regarding the Veteran's claimed residuals of a February 2002 prostatectomy.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is service-connected, hypertension is not service-connected and his restless leg syndrome was not related to service. The Veteran's right shoulder disability, DDD of the lumbar spine, cervical spine disorder, PTSD, and traumatic brain injury residuals have been appropriately rated.
The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is found to be secondary to his service-connected PTSD and the Board grants both service connection for this condition and special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including scheduling a videoconference hearing. The issues of entitlement to service connection for various conditions are on appeal.
The Board has granted an initial evaluation of 30 percent for PTSD, effective January 20, 2009. The Veteran's service-connected prostate disability is secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
The Board has determined that additional development is necessary and has ordered a Travel Board hearing before the Veteran.
The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is being remanded for further development, including obtaining medical opinions regarding its relationship to service-connected diabetes mellitus and any potential herbicide exposure. The issue of special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ will also be deferred until the service connection claim is resolved.
← Back to Erectile dysfunction overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.