Foot (incl. plantar fasciitis, flat feet) decisions — 2015
1,110 indexed Board decisions in 2015.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board found that the Veteran's left foot disability pre-existed service and was not aggravated by service, thus denying his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral flat feet and a left foot disability other than pes planus and hallux valgus. The claim for right foot hallux valgus with degenerative change in the first metatarsophalangeal joint was granted, but only to a 30 percent rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The Veteran's bilateral pes planus and hypertension are found to be related to service, granting the claims for these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied. The Board found no evidence of current disabilities or in-service incurrences that could be related to the claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board found that the reduction in evaluation from 30 percent to 10 percent for bilateral pes planus was improper and restored the 30 percent disability evaluation effective September 1, 2010.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Veteran's left foot/ankle disability is being remanded for further development, including verification of her duty status during periods of active service and a VA examination to determine the nature and likely etiology of her disabilities.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2015
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for the issues of entitlement to an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for plantar fasciitis, left foot and entitlement to service connection for arthritis of the hands, feet, legs, and arms. As a result, these matters are dismissed.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied, and the appeal was dismissed due to failure to timely file a notice of disagreement regarding an effective date issue.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining an addendum opinion regarding the Veteran's pes planus and conducting VA examinations to determine the nature and etiology of his back and bilateral ankle conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left foot pes planus did not begin during active service and is not otherwise etiologically related to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Veteran's combined rating for his service-connected disabilities, including bilateral pes planus, disfiguring scar on the left upper lip area, and tender scar on the left upper lip area, is denied as it does not exceed 30 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including new VA examinations and consideration of the medical records from Fort Leonard Wood submitted by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Veteran is currently in receipt of SMC at the rate equal to subsection (m) based on the loss of use of both legs due to service-connected peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities with additional disability (service-connected bronchial asthma) independently ratable as 100 percent disabling from August 20, 2009. The Veteran's claims for higher levels of SMC under 38 C.F.R. � 3.350(f)(3) and 38 U.S.C.A. � 1114(o) have been denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA spine examination. The issues of service connection for a lumbar spine disability and bilateral foot disability are on appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board found no evidence of a pre-existing foot disability and concluded that the Veteran's current bilateral pes planus and metatarsalgia did not begin in service. The claim was denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral pes planus with bilateral plantar fasciitis has been rated as 50 percent disabling, effective from the date of the grant of service connection. The initial noncompensable disability ratings for left hamstring strain and right ankle sprain have also been granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a lumbar spine disability, left ear hearing loss, and right shoulder disability have been granted. The remaining issues of entitlement to service connection for other conditions are denied.,No effective date has been assigned as the evidence is not sufficient to establish when these disabilities began.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board denied the Veteran's attempt to reopen his claim for a bilateral foot disorder, including plantar fasciitis. The additional evidence received since the March 2010 decision does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claims of entitlement to service connection for plantar fasciitis.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral pes planus and assigned an initial disability rating of 30 percent effective April 26, 2005. The Veteran's claim was reopened due to the presence of clear and unmistakable error in a prior decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including pneumonia, depression, diabetes mellitus, a bilateral foot disability, and skin disabilities were denied as the evidence did not establish full-body exposure to mustard gas or Lewisite during his active duty. The Board found no presumptive service connection based on mustard gas exposure.
← Back to Foot (incl. plantar fasciitis, flat feet) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.