Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
22,930 vetted Board decisions for GERD (acid reflux).
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current diagnoses of gastroesophogeal reflux disorder (GERD) and prostate condition are not related to his military service, and thus denied these claims.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, hiatal hernia, and an increased rating for duodenal ulcer with gastroesophageal reflux disease were all denied. The Veteran was granted a 20% rating for his duodenal ulcer with gastroesophageal reflux disease.,There is no evidence of diabetes mellitus or hiatal hernia during service or within one year post-service, and the Board found that there was insufficient medical evidence to establish a connection between these conditions and service. The Veteran's current duodenal ulcer with gastroesophageal reflux disease has been rated as 20% disabling.
The Board found that the appellant's gastrointestinal disability, including GERD, was not incurred in service and is not related to his active service or any incident therein. The Board also found no evidence of a link between the appellant's post-service gastrointestinal disability and his PTSD.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for gastroesophageal reflux disease is being remanded due to the need for clarification of the etiology of his condition.
The Veteran currently has Raynaud disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease that were present in service.,The Veteran currently has thoracolumbar scoliosis, which was also present in service.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for GERD with hiatal hernia, a pulmonary disorder, an acquired psychiatric disorder, a cervical spine disorder, a right hip disorder, and a left hip disorder. The Veteran was not granted any disability rating or effective date.
The Veteran's chronic lichen sclerosus et atrophicus of the glans penis was incurred during service and is considered a direct result. The stomach disability, presumed to be GERD and hiatus hernia, also appears to have originated in service.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to obtain medical records and provide a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of her claimed disabilities.
The Board has granted service connection for a gastrointestinal disorder other than GERD, but has remanded the claim for sleep disorder due to potential exposure during Gulf War service.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not prevent him from securing or following substantially gainful employment.
The Board has denied all claims for initial compensable evaluations, finding no indication of ongoing or new symptoms that would warrant a higher evaluation.
The Veteran's service-connected GERD with hiatal hernia is currently rated at 10 percent, and the Board finds that this rating is appropriate given his symptoms of dysphagia only.
The Board finds that the Veteran's currently diagnosed gastrointestinal disability, including gastritis and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), is proximately due to or the result of his service-connected back disability. Service connection for this condition is granted.
The Board found that the appellant's active military service from September 1, 2000 to August 31, 2007 does not constitute one entire period of service but rather several distinct periods. Therefore, his character of discharge is considered dishonorable and bars him from receiving VA benefits for this period.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss, bilateral pes planus, a gastroesophageal disorder, and a gastrointestinal disorder. The decision found that there was no evidence of post-service manifestations of hearing loss or any current diagnosis of bilateral pes planus, and thus did not meet VA criteria for disability.
The Board has reopened the claims for service connection for a back disability, right shoulder disability, and skin conditions. The Veteran's current disabilities are presumed to be related to his Vietnam-era exposure to herbicide agents.
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn prior to the Board making a decision.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied as his conditions did not meet the criteria for higher disability evaluations under applicable rating criteria.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bulimia nervosa and gastritis and reflux esophagitis have been granted. The remaining issues, including those related to the right wrist, ankle, and dental disorders, were denied.
The Board has granted service connection for GERD, but found no evidence to support the Veteran's claim of service connection for sinusitis.
← Back to GERD (acid reflux) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.