Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans

Hearing loss

Hearing loss claims rely on audiometric testing and a link to in-service noise exposure. Denials frequently hinge on exam adequacy, which is why many of these appeals are remanded for a new examination.

Across 14,344 real Board appeals for Hearing loss

59% were granted, partly granted, or remanded.

A denial is often not the end — remands are sent back for more development and frequently end in a grant.

  • Granted 13%
  • Partly granted 23%
  • Remanded 22%
  • Denied 34%

What tends to win

Among the appeals that were granted or partly granted, the most common ways Hearing loss was linked to service:

  • Direct service connection4,145
  • Reopened with new & material evidence365
  • Presumptive (no nexus needed)178

How it’s rated, in practice

When Hearing loss was granted, the rating most often assigned was:

  • 100% (1,432)
  • 10% (248)
  • 0% (146)
  • 70% (137)
  • 30% (111)

Presumptive & exposure paths

These appeals involved a recognized exposure — which can mean the link to service is presumed, with no nexus to prove:

  • PACT Act163
  • Agent Orange / herbicides110
  • Gulf War86
  • Camp Lejeune water68
  • Burn pits & airborne hazards29
Check presumptive conditions for your exposure →

Real decisions

Browse all 14,344 Hearing loss decisions →

What you can do next

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.