Ischemic heart disease decisions — 2009
1,304 indexed Board decisions in 2009.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2009
The VA determined that there is no evidence of a nexus between the Veteran's hypertension and heart disease and his service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2009
The Board has determined that the veteran's coronary artery disease and hypertension are proximately due to his service-connected PTSD, warranting service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2009
The Veteran's atherosclerotic heart disease with stent angioplasty to right coronary artery was not manifested by a workload of greater than 5 METs but not greater than 7 METs resulting in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope prior to October 15, 2007. As of October 15, 2007, the Veteran's condition did not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 60 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a heart condition and bronchitis, finding no evidence of chronic disability related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for further development, including verification of in-country service and obtaining medical records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2009
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including verifying a private medical opinion and obtaining a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's current psychiatric disorder had its onset in service or is otherwise etiologically related to his active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2009
The Board has determined that the submitted evidence does not meet the criteria for reopening any of the Veteran's service connection claims, as it is either insufficient to establish new and material evidence or does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, an acquired psychiatric disability (including parasomnia), a memory loss disability, hypertension, and coronary artery disease (CAD) due to lack of evidence supporting these conditions were incurred or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's prostatitis, including postoperative residuals of a transurethral resection of the prostate, was not incurred or aggravated in active service and is unrelated to any disease, injury, or event of service origin.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2009
The Board has granted service connection for the aggravation of hypertension by the service-connected diabetes mellitus. The cardiovascular disease and PVD secondary service connection issues are remanded to obtain medical opinions regarding whether the service-connected diabetes mellitus aggravated the appellant's cardiac disease or PVD.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2009
The Veteran's hypertensive heart disease and hypertension are each rated at 30 percent, with a separate 10 percent rating for hypertension. The claim for an increased rating for hypertensive heart disease is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2009
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination to assess his service-connected heart condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2009
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for heart disease, to include as secondary to service-connected PTSD. The Veteran's hypertension is related to his service-connected PTSD, and his heart disease is related to his service-connected hypertension.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for coronary artery disease is being remanded due to the need for a new VA opinion regarding the relationship between his current condition and his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2009
The Board found that the veteran's arteriosclerotic heart disease did not become manifest during service and is not otherwise related to service. The claim for service connection was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's atherosclerotic heart disease did not result from service-connected schizophrenia, and thus denied the claim for service connection for the cause of death.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2009
The Board has granted service connection for coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease, both claimed as secondary to diabetes mellitus, type II.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current heart disorder and finds no evidence linking any diagnosed condition to his military service. As such, the claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2009
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death due to myocardial infarction and hypertensive heart disease, finding no evidence linking these conditions to his military service. The DIC claim was also denied as there was insufficient evidence showing a causal relationship between the Veteran's service-connected PTSD and his fatal condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2009
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for organic heart disease. The Veteran's organic heart disease is now considered a potential service-connected condition.
← Back to Ischemic heart disease overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.