Ischemic heart disease decisions — 2009
1,304 indexed Board decisions in 2009.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not encompass any disability of the eyes or upper extremities, and his lower extremity conditions are not severe enough to qualify for specially adapted housing or a special home adaptation grant.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Board finds that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection of a heart disability, including coronary artery disease. The medical opinion provided by a VA cardiologist supports the conclusion that the Veteran's current heart disability is more likely than not related to his in-service hyperlipidemia.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's service connection claims for PTSD, major depression, bilateral foot disorder, headache disorder, and heart disorder (atriial fibrillation) have been granted. The bilateral foot disorder claim is denied as not being related to service. The headaches are considered a pre-existing condition that was not aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete medical records and further development is required.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development of his medical records and a VA examination to assess the severity of his hypertensive cardiovascular disease and coronary artery bypass graft residuals.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's service connection claim for CAD, status-post myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass graft is granted. The claim for sleep apnea requires further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's death was not caused by any service-connected disability, including his acne vulgaris. The appellant did not provide evidence showing a link between malaria and the Veteran's later-developed conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Veteran's claims of service connection for GERD, coronary artery disease, and hypertension as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus are being remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's death was caused by lung cancer, which is not service-connected. Other significant conditions contributing to his death (atherosclerotic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic lung disease) are also not service-connected.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Board has restored the 10 percent rating for service-connected residuals of a left thumb fracture and granted service connection for tinnitus. The Veteran's anxiety disorder is not shown to meet the criteria for a higher evaluation.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Veteran's coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, mitral regurgitation, and coronary artery bypass graft with valve repair is currently rated at 30 percent disabling. Bilateral heel spurs with heel calluses are each rated at 10 percent disabling since January 9, 2008.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected heart disease is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and consideration of new evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's rheumatic heart disease existed prior to service and was not aggravated by service, thus denying the claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including a VA examination or medical opinion on his claim of service connection for alcohol dependency secondary to posttraumatic stress disorder.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board found that the appellant's diabetes mellitus and heart condition did not manifest during a period of active duty or within one year after separation from such a period. The conditions are also not presumed to have been incurred in service due to exposure to certain environments or substances. Therefore, service connection for these conditions is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed disabilities are not related to service or carbon tetrachloride exposure, and thus denied his claims for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's heart disorder was not incurred in or aggravated by service, nor may it be presumed to have been incurred in service. The Board also determined that the current heart disorder did not develop as secondary to his service-connected lumbar spine disorder.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate notice and a need for additional medical opinions regarding the cause of death.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him so helpless as to require the aid and attendance of another. The non-service-connected age/senility with generalized body weakness, flexion contractures of the knees with loss of motion and multiple arthritis has rendered him so helpless as to require the aid and attendance of another.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board denied service connection for arteriosclerotic coronary artery disease and a disability manifested by loss of feeling in the arms and hands, finding no evidence of such conditions during or after service. The Veteran's claims were not related to active service.
← Back to Ischemic heart disease overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.