Ischemic heart disease decisions — 2010
1,202 indexed Board decisions in 2010.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claims for increased rating for left ear hearing loss, service connection for a heart disability (claimed as coronary artery disease), and reopening of his claim for an inguinal hernia were all denied. The Board found that the preponderance of evidence was against granting any of these claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and hypertension. The evidence did not support a finding of in-service exposure to herbicides or any link between the claimed conditions and service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Veteran seeks service connection for heart disorders and polyps of the lower intestine, claimed as secondary to in-service herbicide exposure. The case is being remanded for additional development including obtaining medical records and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claims for effective dates prior to January 30, 2005 for service connection have been denied as there is no evidence of a claim filed prior to that date.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's coronary artery disease and erectile dysfunction are proximately due to or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's cardiovascular disorder is found to be a direct result of his service-connected diabetes mellitus. His skin disorder, diagnosed as folliculitis and onychomycosis, is also found to be directly related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Board is remanding the case for additional development to determine if there is a material causal role of the Veteran's service-connected anxiety disability in his death or any underlying conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's coronary artery disease is not related to service or a service-connected disability, did not manifest within the one-year presumptive period for chronic diseases, and CAD is not on the list of disabilities presumed service-connected in Veterans exposed to Agent Orange. Therefore, the claim for service connection for coronary artery disease was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied. The Board found no evidence of any current disabilities related to his active service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, based on the presumption of exposure to herbicide agents during service. The Veteran's ischemic heart disease and hypertension are not addressed as they were not part of the original claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including visual disability, arthritis of the feet (gout), fractured ankles, prostate cancer, heart disability, and COPD, were denied as there is no competent medical evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Board has determined that there is a need for further development to determine if the Veteran's rheumatoid arthritis or its treatment contributed to his death, and whether it was more likely than not that these conditions were related to his service-connected condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's PTSD is found to be related to his combat experiences during service, and the claim for service connection is granted. The claims for bilateral hearing loss, low back disability, heart disease (due to herbicide exposure), and hypertension are not addressed as they do not involve service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board has determined that there is no valid diagnosis of PTSD, and the Veteran's current psychiatric disabilities are not related to service. Therefore, service connection for these conditions is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for tinnitus was denied, and his claim for an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent for coronary artery disease is also denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a finding that the Veteran's current tinnitus or coronary artery disease were related to military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's heart condition as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, Type II. The issues of hypertension and diabetic retinopathy with cataracts are addressed in the REMAND portion of this decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for coronary artery heart disease, finding no competent medical evidence showing a direct or secondary relationship to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board denied the claims for service connection for the cause of death, nonservice-connected death pension benefits, and accrued benefits due to lack of evidence linking the Veteran's death to his service or a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for ischemic heart disease and polyneuropathy were not pending at the time of his death, so he is not entitled to accrued benefits in excess of $4330.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's heart disability and hypertension are related to his military service, including presumed herbicide exposure. As a result, both conditions have been granted service connection.
← Back to Ischemic heart disease overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.