Ischemic heart disease decisions — 2011
983 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2011
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical evidence regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected hysterectomy with HRT caused or aggravated her non-service-connected CAD.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Board has denied all issues on appeal, finding that the appellant does not have a current disability for which service connection can be granted. The cholesterol condition is not considered a disease or disability for VA compensation purposes.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2011
The Veteran's service connection claims for coronary artery disease, skin disorder, and hypertension are granted as secondary to Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Board found that an effective date prior to March 14, 2007 for the grant of DIC benefits is not warranted as there was no indication of intent from the appellant to apply for such benefits before this date.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2011
The Board has granted service connection for malaria, and the case is now focused on whether the Veteran's heart disorder (to include an enlarged heart and/or heart failure) is at least as likely as not related to his service-connected malaria.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.,The Veteran was in receipt of a 20 percent disability rating for diabetes mellitus, which required insulin and a restricted diet.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2011
The Veteran's cause of death, myocardial infarction, is considered presumptively service-connected due to herbicide exposure. The appellant has not identified any pending claim at the time of her husband's death and thus cannot establish entitlement to accrued benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hypertension, coronary artery disease, and left hip replacement were not incurred or aggravated by active service. The evidence does not show any in-service injury or treatment for these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's ossicles of the left foot 5th metatarsal and ischemic heart disease (claimed as coronary artery disease) have been granted service connection. The ossicles are attributed to a line-of-duty injury during ACDUTRA, while the ischemic heart disease is presumed based on exposure to herbicide agents in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Board has granted service connection for a heart disorder, manifested by left ventricular hypertrophy, and increased the initial evaluation of the service-connected bilateral inferior altitudinal field defect to 50 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Board has determined that additional development of the evidence is required before a decision can be made on the Veteran's claims for service connection and cause of death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain additional VA clinical records and clarify her intent regarding the issues on appeal. The claims will be readjudicated after these actions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Veteran's claim of service connection for heart disease is being remanded due to the need for additional evidence, including National Guard records and VA treatment records.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's claim to reopen the service connection for aortic valve disease, claimed as heart condition, was denied. The Board found that new and material evidence had been received but did not find sufficient evidence to establish service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for further development, including obtaining VA treatment records and affording him a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed coronary artery disease. The issue of service connection for TDIU remains inextricably intertwined with the issue of whether the Veteran's coronary artery disease is proximately due to or aggravated by his valvular heart disease.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Board has remanded the case for further development and consideration, including obtaining additional medical records and providing VCAA notice.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to issues related to service connection and exposure claims, as well as a need to consider new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedSeptember 2011
The Board has remanded the case to obtain an addendum opinion from a VA examiner regarding whether diabetes mellitus was a primary or contributing cause of death, and how it may apply to the Veteran's causes of death. The claim will be readjudicated based on this new information.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2011
The Veteran is seeking service connection for hypertension, which he claims may be caused or aggravated by his service-connected PTSD, coronary artery disease, and type II diabetes mellitus. The case has been remanded to provide a VA examination and address the issue of secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2011
The Veteran's death was caused by atherosclerotic hypertensive cardiovascular disease, which is presumed to be due to exposure to herbicides in the Republic of Vietnam. The Board finds service connection for the cause of his death is warranted.
← Back to Ischemic heart disease overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.