Ischemic heart disease decisions — 2011
983 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2011
The Board has found that the Veteran's claim for service connection for a heart disorder should be remanded due to the need to obtain additional medical records and review the case.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2011
The Board has dismissed the appeal as the underlying service connection claim for a heart disorder, to include as secondary to service-connected Type II diabetes mellitus, has been resolved in favor of the Veteran with the grant of service connection on a presumptive basis due to herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected conditions did not cause or contribute to his death. The preponderance of evidence indicated that other factors, such as hypertension, chronic alcohol abuse, hyperlipidemia, and morbid obesity, were more likely causes of the Veteran's coronary artery disease.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection for lung, heart, kidney, and prostate disabilities are being remanded due to the need for additional development including VA examinations.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2011
The Board finds that the Veteran's CAD is presumptively associated with his in-service herbicide exposure and grants service connection for this condition. The claims for chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and malaria residuals are denied as there is no competent medical evidence to support their association with service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II; vertigo; and heart disorder are not related to his active service. The claims for these conditions were denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's coronary artery disease is at least as likely as not caused or aggravated by his service-connected hypertension, and thus grants service connection for this condition on a secondary basis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2011
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for heart disease due to new and material evidence submitted since the last final denial. However, further development is needed as a VA examination is required to determine if the current heart condition is related to service.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2011
The Board has dismissed the claim as the Veteran's service connection for coronary artery disease was granted due to herbicide exposure pursuant to Nehmer v. U.S. Veterans Admin.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2011
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, as presumptively due to inservice exposure to herbicides. The other claims are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2011
The Board found no evidence of service connection for the claimed conditions, including diabetes mellitus, sleep disorder, heart disorder, and eye disorder. The Veteran's claims were denied as there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that these conditions are related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2011
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine if the Veteran's death was caused by his service-connected disabilities or due to a condition related to his in-service treatment. The appellant must be provided with proper VCAA notice and any relevant medical records should be obtained.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2011
The Veteran's service connection for coronary artery disease is granted as it is presumed to have been incurred in active service due to exposure to herbicide agents. The claims for peripheral vascular disease, residuals of tracheostomy, and acid reflux are not addressed.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2011
The Veteran's heart disorder, including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, was found to have been incurred in service.,Bilateral hearing loss was also determined to be related to active service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2011
The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 50% effective May 11, 2010. The VA examiner found the Veteran to have occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity due to symptoms such as flattened affect, impaired judgment, disturbances of motivation and mood, difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective relationships.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2011
The Board has determined that additional development is needed for the Veteran's claims, including obtaining new VA examinations to address his heart disorder, hearing loss, and tinnitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including new examinations and issuance of a statement of the case on issues related to his diabetes mellitus type II, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and retinopathy.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2011
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and a temporary total rating were denied. The left knee disability is currently rated as 10 percent disabling, with separate ratings for limitation of flexion and ACL deficiency.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2011
The Veteran's initial claim for service connection for coronary artery disease and PTSD was granted, with an initial rating of 10 percent each. The RO also denied a higher rating for both conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2011
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses incurred at Rockingham Memorial Hospital on July 9, 2009 is granted as the treatment was for a condition that would have been considered an emergency by a prudent layperson.
← Back to Ischemic heart disease overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.