Ischemic heart disease decisions — 2017
2,103 indexed Board decisions in 2017.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2017
The Veteran died in March 1989 due to atherosclerotic heart disease. The appellant filed for DIC benefits on March 19, 2015, and the effective date was set at March 19, 2014. The Board found that an earlier effective date is not warranted as VA did not review the claim within one year of August 31, 2010, when ischemic heart disease became a presumptive disease.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2017
The Veteran's service-connected coronary artery disease is now rated at 100 percent effective July 27, 2015.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's brain tumor, heart condition, and bilateral shoulder disability are not related to his military service or any in-service chemical exposures. The claims for these conditions have been denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2017
The Veteran's claim for service connection for coronary artery disease is denied as there was no in-service exposure to herbicides and the condition did not develop due to a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's heart condition is not caused or aggravated by his service-connected tuberculosis, and thus denied both secondary service connection for a heart condition as well as an increased rating for tuberculosis.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2017
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for increased ratings in excess of 60 percent for coronary artery disease, in excess of 10 percent for left knee fracture with degenerative spurs and crepitus, and in excess of 10 percent for right foot fracture of the fifth toe with degenerative joint space narrowing and hallux valgus.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2017
The Board denied the claims for service connection for bilateral vision impairment, bilateral hearing loss, acid reflux or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and heart condition due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2017
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need to verify his exposure to Agent Orange at Fort Gordon, Georgia. Additionally, a VA examination is needed to determine if his prostatitis is related to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2017
The Board finds that the Veteran's service in Thailand during the Vietnam War, where he served as part of a crash crew observing aircraft missions and spraying activities, brought him to the perimeter on a regular occasion. Given this exposure to herbicides, the Board grants service connection for ischemic heart disease.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · July 2017
The Veteran's hypertension is found to be related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, which was caused by herbicide exposure in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board grants service connection for hypertension.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2017
The Board has restored the Veteran's disability rating for ischemic heart disease post pacemaker implant from 30 percent to 60 percent, effective July 12, 2012. The reduction was improper due to failure to follow proper procedures.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2017
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a heart condition due to new and material evidence. The Veteran is presumed to have been exposed to an herbicide agent while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, which allows for presumptive service connection for ischemic heart disease.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJuly 2017
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been received to reopen the Veteran's claim for ischemic heart disease, as there is no current diagnosis of this condition. The reopened PTSD claim will be further evaluated based on the provided evidence.,New and material evidence has been received sufficient enough to reopen the Veteran's claim for PTSD, with a new theory of entitlement based on fear of hostile military or terrorist activity.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2017
The Board found that the reduction of the rating for bipolar disorder from 70 percent to 50 percent was improper and restored the original 70 percent rating. The Veteran's left forearm scar, hemorrhoids, and pinguecula were not rated higher than zero percent due to lack of disabling effects.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2017
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevent him from obtaining and retaining substantially gainful employment, warranting a grant of TDIU.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2017
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for further development to verify his exposure to DDT during service and to obtain a medical opinion regarding the relationship between his current heart and respiratory disorders and his claimed in-service exposures.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2017
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim of service connection for a heart disability, including ischemic heart disease. The evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran's current heart disability is related to his military service or exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2017
The Veteran's service-connected ischemic heart disease did not render him unable to obtain and secure substantially gainful employment prior to August 12, 2010.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2017
The Board has granted service connection for COPD due to asbestos exposure during service, resolving all reasonable doubt in the Veteran's favor.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2017
The Board found that the Veteran does not have confirmed exposure to herbicide agents or hazardous jet fuel during service, and thus denied his claims for service connection based on direct evidence of a link between his current disabilities and active duty.
← Back to Ischemic heart disease overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.