Ischemic heart disease decisions — 2018
4,103 indexed Board decisions in 2018.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · June 2018
The Veteran's heart disease and lipoma cysts are granted service connection due to presumed exposure to herbicides, specifically Agent Orange. The Board finds the Veteran's assertions of proximity to the perimeter of his base in Thailand credible.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2018
The Veteran's rating reduction from 100 percent to 30 percent for hypertensive heart disease was challenged, and the Board has decided it needs further examination to determine if the current condition warrants a higher rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2018
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, is granted a 40 percent rating from the date of service connection. The Veteran's coronary artery disease prior to March 1, 2013, does not meet the criteria for a higher than 30 percent rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2018
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings and TDIU is being remanded due to the need to obtain additional medical records from Riverside Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, Dr. L. Blumberg, and any private cardiologist he has seen.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2018
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for a psychiatric disorder to include PTSD and depression. The claims for service connection for migraines, arteriosclerotic heart disease (coronary artery disease), psychosis, and a psychiatric disorder are being remanded due to incomplete records.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2018
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death, and the claim has become moot.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2018
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals regarding the disability evaluations for ischemic heart disease, coronary artery disease, and status post coronary artery bypass.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2018
The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's service connection claims due to insufficient medical opinions regarding whether his obesity, caused by his service-connected right knee disability, is a substantial factor in causing other disabilities. The claims for service connection for left knee, lower back, left hip, heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus are all remanded.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2018
The Veteran's petition to reopen claims for service connection for chronic skin disorder, PTSD, hearing loss, tinnitus, nerve disability of the ear, heart disability, and abdominal disorder (cyclic vomiting syndrome) were granted. Service connection was established for vitiligo and denied for other conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2018
The appeal of the denials of service connection for various conditions due to herbicide exposure is dismissed. Service connection for tinnitus is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2018
The Veteran's service connection for diabetes mellitus type II and coronary artery disease is granted due to herbicide exposure. The Board finds the Veteran was exposed to herbicides during his service in Thailand, but remands for further examination on secondary service connection issues.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2018
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his coronary artery disease was denied as the evidence did not show more than one episode of acute congestive heart failure in the past year or a workload of greater than 3 METs but not greater than 5 METs resulting in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope. The Veteran's claim for TDIU was also denied as his service-connected disabilities did not render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2018
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings were dismissed. The Board found that the Veteran was entitled to a total disability rating based on unemployability due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2018
The Veteran's coronary artery disease with bradycardia was granted an initial evaluation of 30 percent, but not in excess thereof, for the period on appeal prior to March 31, 2014. The rating was then increased to 60 percent from November 1, 2016, to January 29, 2018.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2018
The Veteran's service connection claim for ischemic heart disease due to Agent Orange exposure is denied because his service was not within the time frame prescribed by Congress for presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2018
The Veteran's heart disability, including coronary artery disease, was incurred in service and the Board granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2018
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for lung disability is dismissed. The claim of residual health problems secondary to Project SHAD, also claimed as birth defect in grandchild, is denied. The claims for sleep disability, heart disability, blackout spells, lymph node disability, and acquired psychiatric disorder are remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2018
The Veteran's claims for service connection are remanded due to the need for additional records and verification of his reported flight onboard the USS ORISKANY.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2018
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not preclude him from securing or following substantially gainful employment prior to February 20, 2013.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2018
The Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea was denied as not incurred in or related to service.,A rating of 30 percent for coronary artery disease (CAD) is granted, effective from September 2010.
← Back to Ischemic heart disease overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.