Ischemic heart disease decisions — 2023
2,638 indexed Board decisions in 2023.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2023
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for service connection for coronary artery disease due to potential issues with the sufficiency of the medical opinions provided and the need to verify the Veteran's service in Vietnam. The case will be returned for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2023
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable or unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2023
The appeal for service connection claims related to a respiratory disorder, chronic right knee disability, and bilateral shin splints are dismissed. The Veteran's heart disorder and acquired psychiatric disorder claims are remanded. The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss claim is also remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2023
The Board has remanded the case due to lack of substantial compliance with previous remand directives, specifically regarding a VA medical opinion on whether the Veteran's heart conditions are aggravated by service and if they are related to her service-connected asthma.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2023
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for TDIU entitlement, finding that his service-connected disabilities did not prevent him from securing and maintaining gainful employment prior to October 3, 2013.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · January 2023
The Veteran's prostate cancer, diabetes mellitus type II, coronary artery disease, hypertension, right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, and left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy are all granted as service-connected due to exposure to herbicide agents.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2023
The Board has remanded the claim for further development to determine if the Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents while serving in Korea, flying in and out of the DMZ as a medical specialist.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2023
The Veteran's CAD was granted a rating of 60 percent from February 14, 2018 to May 14, 2018. From May 15, 2018 onwards, the claim for an increased rating is denied. The TDIU claim is also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2023
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including coronary artery disease, PTSD, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral neuropathy with CTS of the upper extremities and lower extremities, have rendered him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment prior to November 17, 2022.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2023
The Board has granted service connection for a heart condition, including right bundle branch block, finding that the Veteran's condition began during his military service and is not a congenital defect or disease.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2023
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a heart disability, including nonischemic heart disease, AICD, status post myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation, as these conditions are not related to his military service or exposure to herbicide agents. The Board found that there is no evidence linking the current heart disabilities to his in-service injuries.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2023
The Board has determined that additional development is needed for the Veteran's claim of a higher initial evaluation for his service-connected coronary artery disease. The case will be returned to the AOJ for further action.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2023
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence linking the Veteran's service-connected psychiatric disability or active duty service, including in-service complaints of dyspnea, to his cause of death. The appellant is asked to provide any additional medical records and a VA clinician will be requested to provide an opinion on whether there is a relationship between the Veteran's depression and his coronary artery disease.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2023
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical evidence and the need for an addendum VA medical opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2023
The Board denied service connection for a lumbar spine disability, asthma, COPD, radiculopathy of the upper and lower extremities, prostate cancer, and CAD.,Service connection was not granted for any of these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2023
The Veteran's cause of death, multi-system organ failure following a heart transplant, was found to be related to his service-connected ischemic heart disease, which the Board determined was caused by his in-service asbestos exposure. The appeal for service connection for the cause of death is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2023
The Board has determined that the Veteran's heart condition is not caused or aggravated by his service-connected PTSD, and therefore denied the claim for secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2023
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a heart disability, including on a presumptive basis due to herbicide exposure in Vietnam, is remanded. The Board notes that the Veteran has a history of heart treatment and a diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. A medical opinion is needed regarding whether his diagnosed heart disability is at least as likely as not related to his presumed herbicide agent exposure.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2023
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to his death, and the Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of these claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · January 2023
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to exposure to herbicide agents, including Agent Orange exposure while stationed in Thailand. The appellant is seeking presumptive service connection based on her husband's alleged exposure to herbicides during his military service.
← Back to Ischemic heart disease overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.