Ischemic heart disease decisions — 2024
2,466 indexed Board decisions in 2024.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2024
The Board has granted a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) from October 26, 2023, due to the Veteran's service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2024
The Board has decided to remand the case due to internal inconsistencies in the VA medical examinations and a need for further examination to determine if any diagnosed heart conditions are presumptively related to herbicide exposure during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2024
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for coronary artery disease was denied. The effective date of the 60 percent rating for coronary artery disease is set at May 4, 2018. The earlier effective date for loss of teeth secondary to Hodgkin's disease is granted but no earlier than October 19, 2011.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2024
A 100 percent rating for coronary artery disease (CAD) is granted.,Special monthly compensation (SMC) at the housebound rate is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2024
The Board has granted service connection for a heart disability and obstructive sleep apnea on the basis of secondary service connection, finding that these conditions are at least as likely as not caused by or related to the Veteran's service-connected hypertension and adjustment disorder, respectively.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2024
Effective January 31, 2012, the Veteran was granted a TDIU rating on an extraschedular basis. The Board found that his service-connected disabilities prevented him from securing and following substantially gainful employment before September 22, 2016.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2024
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for coronary artery disease and low back disability, but has remanded both issues due to insufficient evidence regarding the nature of his conditions and their relationship to service.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2024
The Board dismissed the appeal for an increased rating for hypertension and denied a request for an earlier effective date for the grant of a 100 percent disability rating for coronary artery disease. The TDIU claim was also denied as there was no inferred or formal claim prior to November 22, 2017.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2024
The Veteran's appeal on the issues of lung disorder and heart disability service connection has been dismissed due to his death. The Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate these claims as he is deceased.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2024
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD, is granted. The Board also grants secondary service connection for a heart condition to include hypertension and coronary artery disease as secondary to PTSD.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · March 2024
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, prostate cancer and arteriosclerotic heart disease are granted on a presumptive basis due to exposure to herbicide agents during service in the territorial waters of Guam. The effective date is August 10, 2022.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · March 2024
The Board has remanded the case due to an inadequate VA medical opinion and the need for a PACT Act-compliant examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2024
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's need for aid and attendance, loss of use of feet and/or lower extremities, and whether his service-connected disabilities alone caused these issues. Additional VA treatment records are needed, as well as an addendum opinion from a clinician.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · March 2024
The Veteran's claim for service connection for ischemic heart disease was granted on a presumptive basis due to herbicide exposure, effective January 29, 2015. The TDIU claim was also granted as of the same date.,An earlier effective date is denied because the evidence does not show that the Veteran met all eligibility criteria for the liberalized benefit prior to the effective date of the law or VA issue.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2024
Your appeal has been dismissed because the Veteran passed away during the pendency of this case.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · March 2024
Service connection for ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and monoclonal gammopathy was granted effective August 10, 2022.,The PACT Act of 2022 (Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act) went into effect on this date, granting the claims based on its provisions.,No compensable ratings were granted for any of these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2024
The Veteran's initial rating for valvular heart disease was denied, but a higher rating of 60 percent is granted since October 29, 2012. The claim for post-surgical scars associated with heart surgery resulted in denial of a compensable rating.,A TDIU claim for the period prior to December 27, 2012, was denied due to lack of evidence showing inability to secure or follow gainful employment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2024
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to properly adjudicate the Veteran's claims, including VA examinations and medical opinions regarding his service-connected conditions and any potential links to his current disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2024
The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including heart condition, diabetes mellitus, type II, emphysema, irritable colon syndrome, and lung cancer are remanded due to new evidence received. A VA examination is required as the issues involve complex medical questions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2024
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's heart condition and his contention that it is related to service, including toxic exposure risk activities. The case will be reviewed again with additional development.
← Back to Ischemic heart disease overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.