Hepatitis C decisions — 2003
175 indexed Board decisions in 2003.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2003
The Board has remanded the case to the RO for additional development of the claim for service connection for hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2003
Your claim for service connection for Hepatitis C, including as due to Agent Orange exposure, is being remanded to the Togus RO for a videoconference hearing before the Board.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2003
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development and readjudication due to changes in the law, notification requirements, and missing medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an earlier effective date for PTSD and for special monthly compensation due to being housebound.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for back injury, left forearm cellulitis pursuant to 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151, PTSD, and hepatitis C with liver disorder due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMay 2003
The veteran's muscle injury of the right anterior thigh is rated at 30 percent, while his hepatitis C remains noncompensable.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2003
The veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C is being remanded to the RO for additional development and consideration.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2003
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to ensure full and complete compliance with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, as this claim was pending at the time of its passage. The case is being remanded for further action.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C and back disability were not incurred or aggravated during service, and thus denied both claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2003
The Board finds that the veteran's hepatitis C was incurred during his active military service, and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2003
The Board has remanded the case to the RO for further development and review of the evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an initial noncompensable rating for hepatitis C, finding that there was no objective evidence of liver damage or disabling symptoms.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C is attributable to service, and grants the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2003
The Board found that the cause of the veteran's death was not related to any service-connected disability or a presumptive condition, and thus denied the claim for service connection for the cause of death.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2003
The Board found that hepatitis C was not incurred in or aggravated by the veteran's active duty service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2003
The Board has denied the veteran's claims of service connection for psychiatric disability and hepatitis C, finding no new and material evidence to reopen the psychiatric claim and concluding that there is insufficient evidence linking the current diagnoses to active service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2003
The RO denied service connection for hepatitis C. The case is being remanded to the RO to schedule a videoconference hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C was not incurred in or aggravated by wartime service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2003
The VA determined that the veteran's hepatitis C was not caused by a VA hospitalization in 1983, and thus denied his claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2003
The Board determined that the veteran's hepatitis C was incurred as a result of his drug abuse during service and is attributable to his pre-existing condition.
← Back to Hepatitis C overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.