Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
453 vetted Board decisions in 2005.
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C virus is related to his military service and granted service connection. However, there is no evidence linking the current chronic bronchitis to his military service.
The VA denied a compensable rating for hepatitis C, finding that the evidence did not support higher evaluations based on intermittent fatigue and malaise or incapacitating episodes.
The veteran is seeking service connection for hepatitis C, but the case has been remanded due to the need for further medical examination and opinion.
The veteran seeks service connection for hepatitis C. The RO failed to obtain the service medical records from his first period of service (August 1969 to November 1970), and his service personnel records, which are necessary to make a decision on all the evidence of the case.
The Board has granted service connection for hepatitis C and assigned a 20 percent evaluation for diabetes mellitus, effective July 9, 2001.
The Board has granted service connection for hepatitis C and assigned an initial 10 percent evaluation from January 21, 1999. The veteran's claim is now pending on the issue of whether he should receive a higher disability rating.
The veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C was denied as there is no competent evidence linking the condition to his military service.
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical opinions and records related to the veteran's hepatitis C claim and his heart disability claim under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
The VA has arranged for a medical opinion regarding the relationship between the veteran's hepatitis in service and his current hepatitis C. The case is remanded to clarify whether there is at least a 50% probability of a nexus.
The veteran's initial claim of entitlement to service connection for hepatitis C was granted, but he is still seeking an initial compensable rating.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining records and scheduling medical examinations.
The Board found that the most likely risk factor for the veteran's hepatitis C was intranasal drug use, and denied service connection based on this finding.
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C disability met the criteria for a 100% evaluation as of March 1, 2000.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development due to the need for a new VA examination and the retrieval of relevant medical records.
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims due to incomplete notification of VCAA provisions and in order to obtain additional medical records. The earlier effective date claims are also inextricably intertwined with the current claim for service connection.
The Board denied the veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for hepatitis C, headaches, a right shoulder disorder, a left foot condition, and a right knee disorder. The Board found that these conditions were not incurred or aggravated by service.
The Board has granted service connection for hepatitis C effective from December 3, 2003. The veteran's claim was initially denied in May 1970 but reopened and granted again on December 3, 2003.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C, finding that there is no evidence of a nexus between his current diagnosis and active military service.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claims of service connection for hepatitis A, B, and C. The veteran's claim is pending further development.
The veteran's hepatitis C was initially granted service connection and assigned a noncompensable evaluation. From July 2, 2001, the VA increased his rating to 20 percent based on continued treatment and symptoms.
← Back to Hepatitis C overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.