Hepatitis C decisions — 2005
453 indexed Board decisions in 2005.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2005
The veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining dosage estimates of radiation exposure and a VA opinion regarding the nature and etiology of his claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2005
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete records and further review of the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board has denied the appellant's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. ¶ 1151 for Hepatitis C infection, service connection for Hepatitis C and PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board finds the veteran's hepatitis C was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran is competent for VA benefits purposes and restored his competency status.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2005
The VA granted service connection for hepatitis C and assigned a 10 percent rating, effective from May 31, 2000. The veteran's claim was not about service connection at all.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board has determined that hepatitis C is not related to service and denied the veteran's claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2005
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the cause of death and eligibility for Dependents' Educational Assistance.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2005
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for further development, including a VA examination and obtaining SSA records. The issues of hepatitis-C evaluation, TDIU, and compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 are all inextricably intertwined and will be addressed together.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2005
The Board previously denied service connection for hepatitis C and porphyria cutanea tarda. The case is being remanded to the RO&IC for further development, including providing VCAA notice and considering additional evidence submitted by the veteran's representative.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C is not related to his active service and denied his claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2005
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to new evidence submitted by the veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2005
The Board found no current diagnosis of PTSD and denied the veteran's claim for service connection. The issue of hepatitis C was also addressed, but further development is needed before a decision can be made.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2005
The veteran's polyarthralgia is not service-connected as it is not proximately due to or the result of her service-connected sarcoidosis. The Board denied her claims for TDIU and pension based on the lack of evidence showing she was unemployable or permanently disabled.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2005
The veteran's claim for an increased initial rating for hepatitis C is being remanded due to the need for additional development and notification.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2005
The Board has granted the veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2005
The Board found no evidence to support the claim of service connection for hepatitis C, and denied the appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2005
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining additional medical records and conducting examinations to address the veteran's claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2005
The veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C is being remanded due to the need for a more complete VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2005
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VCAA notice and further development is required.
← Back to Hepatitis C overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.