Hepatitis C decisions — 2006
515 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2006
The Board has remanded the case for a VA examination to determine the current nature, extent and severity of the veteran's service-connected hepatitis C disability, including cirrhosis. The AMC will then readjudicate the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C was not incurred or aggravated by service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board denied the veteran's son, D., as a helpless child due to his physical and mental disabilities not being permanent at the age of 18. The decision also noted that the veteran's son has been receiving Social Security benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to inconsistencies in the VA examiner's opinions regarding the etiology of hepatitis C and will need further clarification.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The Board found that the appellant's hepatitis C was due to his own willful misconduct (drug abuse) during service, and therefore denied compensation.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The Board has determined that there is no competent medical evidence of hepatitis C or a bilateral eye disorder incurred in service, and thus the veteran's claims for these conditions are denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2006
The Board finds that the veteran's hepatitis C is related to his service as a hospital supply clerk, and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedNovember 2006
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for liver disease, to include Hepatitis C. However, new medical opinions have not established a direct relationship between the veteran's period of service and his current diagnosis.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's current diagnosis of hepatitis C is etiologically related to an in-service injury where he was stabbed with a hypodermic needle, and thus service connection for hepatitis C is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C does not warrant a rating higher than 10 percent, as his symptoms do not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran currently does not have a disability due to hepatitis C, and therefore service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for obesity, myositis, and hepatitis C. The claim for hepatitis C was also denied under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 due to lack of evidence of a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedNovember 2006
The veteran's psychiatric disorder is service-connected, but he cannot receive compensation under the 1151 provision for his liver disease due to a lack of causal connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2006
The Board has remanded the veteran's claim for hepatitis C to determine if it is related to service, including tattoos or a blood transfusion after a fall in September 1973. The case will be re-adjudicated following the VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2006
The Board has remanded the case for additional development to obtain medical records and arrange for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The Board has determined that there is no medical evidence to establish PTSD, and thus denied the veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD. The issue of hepatitis C remains pending as it was not addressed in this decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The Board found that the veteran's hepatitis C is unrelated to his active duty service and denied the claim. The mental disorder issue was not addressed due to a hearing request being withdrawn.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The Board found that the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of PTSD and denied both his claim for service connection for PTSD and his request for an increased rating for hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C does not meet or approximate the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2006
The Board found that the veteran's hepatitis C was not incurred in service and denied his claim.
← Back to Hepatitis C overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.