Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
609 vetted Board decisions in 2008.
The Board found that the veteran's current Hepatitis C did not have its onset during service and is otherwise unrelated to his service. Therefore, the claim for service connection for Hepatitis C was denied.
The veteran withdrew his appeal for the issues of entitlement to service connection for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hepatitis C and a skin rash at his June 2008 Board hearing.
The Board found that the veteran's scars on his left wrist were not incurred in service and denied his claim. The issue of hepatitis C was also addressed, but a VA examination is needed to determine its etiology.
The Board is remanding the claim to the RO for further development due to missing service medical records and incomplete VCAA notice.
The veteran's major depressive disorder is service-connected as secondary to his PTSD. He also has hepatitis C, which he contends was incurred in-service due to a blood transfusion.,PTSD prior to February 20, 2008: The veteran had some occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity.
The veteran withdrew his appeal for service connection of hepatitis C, and the case is dismissed.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a Board hearing.
The Board finds that the veteran's service-connected PTSD contributed substantially or materially to cause his death from alcoholic liver disease, and grants service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
The veteran's PTSD has resulted in total occupational and social impairment since March 1, 2004. The VA has granted a higher initial evaluation for PTSD.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain medical records and for further consideration of his claims.
The Board has granted service connection for hepatitis C and liver disease, including residuals of cirrhosis and liver cancer, due to presumed exposure to Agent Orange during service in Korea.
The veteran's depression and hepatitis C were granted service connection, with effective dates of October 29, 2004. A total disability rating based on individual unemployability was also granted as of February 12, 2005.
The Board denied service connection for hepatitis C and the increased rating claim for varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency of the right lower extremity. The veteran's active duty as a medic did not provide evidence of exposure to contaminated blood or fluids, and his post-service medical records showed he was diagnosed with hepatitis C in 2000.
The Board found no evidence of hepatitis C exposure during service and denied the claim as there was insufficient medical evidence to link current hepatitis C to service.
The Board has remanded the case for further development regarding the veteran's hepatitis C and right hand condition, including Raynaud's phenomenon. The claims are to be adjudicated again based on the additional evidence.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for his service-connected dorsal spine injury and hepatitis C. The veteran was previously assigned a 10 percent evaluation for hepatitis C, but the current evidence does not support an increase to a higher rating. For the dorsal spine disability, the evidence showed that while there were orthopedic manifestations including pain, they did not meet the criteria for a higher than 20 percent evaluation based on Diagnostic Codes 5292 and 5295.
The veteran seeks payment or reimbursement for unauthorized medical expenses incurred between February 14, 2002 and December 16, 2002. The VAMC denied the claim due to lack of evidence showing emergent need for non-VA prescribed medications. The Board has decided to remand the case for further review.
The veteran died from cirrhosis of the liver due to gastrointestinal bleeding. The appellant seeks service connection for both his cause of death and hepatitis C, which is a condition he was diagnosed with prior to his death.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have hepatitis C, residuals of rheumatic fever, depression, PTSD, or chronic alcoholism that are related to his military service.
The veteran's hepatitis C has been granted service connection, but an initial rating in excess of 10 percent is denied prior to January 10, 2007. As of that date, a 20 percent rating was assigned.
← Back to Hepatitis C overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.