Hepatitis C decisions — 2009
589 indexed Board decisions in 2009.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal was remanded to obtain additional evidence regarding the veteran's claimed exposure to hepatitis C during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board found that the preponderance of the evidence was against a link between the veteran's hepatitis C and his service, denying the appeal for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The Board remands the case for further development to determine the degree of impairment due to hepatitis C and its impact on employability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development of evidence related to the veteran's claimed stressors and the etiology of his Hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, hypertension, hepatitis C, and defective vision are being remanded for additional development.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected hepatitis C, PTSD, and right foot plantar wart did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2009
The veteran's liver condition, diagnosed as Hepatitis C, is related to his active service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development of evidence related to the veteran's claims for service connection for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2009
The Board granted service connection for renal insufficiency as secondary to the veteran's service-connected type II diabetes mellitus and infectious hepatitis, but denied increased evaluations for peripheral neuropathy of both lower extremities and upper extremities, and denied reopening claims for PTSD, dyspneic disorder with anxiety, and hypertensive vascular disease.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2009
The Board granted service connection for depression as secondary to the veteran's hepatitis C and restored service connection for hepatitis C, while dismissing other claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C was denied because new and material evidence has not been received to reopen the previously denied claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2009
The veteran's hepatitis C was granted service connection based on the evidence that he likely contracted it during his combat service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran was granted service connection for PTSD and assigned an initial 30 percent evaluation, which was later increased to 50 percent. The claim for a higher rating for PTSD was denied as the evidence did not show occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas due to such symptoms as suicidal ideation, obsessional rituals, near-continuous panic or depression affecting the ability to function independently, impaired impulse control, spatial disorientation, neglect of personal appearance and hygiene, difficulty adapting to stressful circumstances, and inability to establish and maintain effective relationships. The claim for service connection for Hepatitis C was also denied as there is no evidence that it was incurred in or aggravated by active military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C was remanded to obtain a medical examination and additional evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied service connection for hepatitis C and lumbar spine degenerative disc disease, finding no evidence of a causal relationship to the veteran's active military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's claims for service connection for Hepatitis C Virus, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus were denied as there was no medical evidence confirming the presence of these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied service connection for alcohol and drug abuse as it is not etiologically related to a service-connected disability, and denied service connection for hepatitis C as it is also not etiologically related to a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The Board remands the claim for further development, including obtaining additional medical evidence and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal is remanded to obtain additional evidence, including VA treatment records and a verified in-service stressor for PTSD, as well as an examination to determine the etiology of hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC) in Washington, DC, for the purpose of scheduling a Travel Board hearing.
← Back to Hepatitis C overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.